A little help with part 2 of this, please. Thanks in advance.
Sorry, the part that's cut off says 'Claire's path' and the corner that's cut off is labelled F and is the farmhouse.
I will get back to this one. This was the dreaded 2001 question that was so hard, apparently the committee got fired for it.
This will take considerable time to explain. I also want to type up a solution for the first part as well, so that it can be added to the compilation in entirety.
For this question, it is best to solve it graphically, as its more likely to make mistakes doing it algebraically
"Best" is debatable - I've seen students accidentally sketch these wrong. "Most efficient" - yes.
Is there a chance of them asking to integrate absolute values in the exam (Not in MC)? Because i would like to know the algebraic method
As Opengangs said, you must take cases.
This is what I usually always do, but in the answers they used the rounded off value.
This is my recommendation.
You are safe to use an unrounded value if the question actually told you to compute an approximate value, like the one you've shown. Since they've stated that you must show \(k \approx 0.0347 \), you can keep using it if you wish.
If they just ask you to bluntly
find the value of k, as opposed to showing an approximation holds, then you should use the exact value.
Note, however, that the one you've shown
is the ONLY time I've seen a rounded value get used without problems.