Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 04, 2024, 02:07:22 am

Author Topic: HSC Chemistry Question Thread  (Read 1048996 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

noonedoesnt

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1170 on: November 01, 2016, 02:28:23 pm »
0
why is it that the strength of an acid/base does not affect the volume required for titration (rather, the concentration of the acids affects the volumes)? E.g. if both acid/base solutions are 0.1M it does not matter whether one or the other is weak or strong - the same volumes for neutralisation will be required.

This makes sense calculation wise for tritrations to me (n=cv), but, I thought that for neutralisation, it's based on H+ + OH- --> H2O, and the concentration of H+ in weak acids is less than the concentration of the acid, wouldn't this affect the volume neeeded for neutralisation?

but it doesn't. ._.

I believe in a strong acid + strong base the equal moles of H+ and OH- neutralise, and the reaction goes to completion.

However in a weak acid + strong base, the equation is an equilibrium equation and the strong base forces the creation of more H+ as it reacts with OH-, thus the same volumes are required.

That's what I think anyways, Rui will be able to elaborate a bit more.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1171 on: November 01, 2016, 02:31:16 pm »
0

why is it that the strength of an acid/base does not affect the volume required for titration (rather, the concentration of the acids affects the volumes)? E.g. if both acid/base solutions are 0.1M it does not matter whether one or the other is weak or strong - the same volumes for neutralisation will be required.

This makes sense calculation wise for tritrations to me (n=cv), but, I thought that for neutralisation, it's based on H+ + OH- --> H2O, and the concentration of H+ in weak acids is less than the concentration of the acid, wouldn't this affect the volume neeeded for neutralisation?

but it doesn't. ._.
This is the exact same reaction that occurs in all titrations. Which is why we never use a weak base and weak acid because that will cause concentrations to matter too much.

At the instant one of the species is strong, things happen. Note that the weak one, say, weak acid, does not fully ionise by itself.

But what happens when you add a strong base? The OH-'s there are fully ionised. Clearly the OH- will react with the H+.

Thus the weak acid lost H+. Hence by Le chatelier's principle, the system will want to replace the most H+, thus more of it gets ionised.

But this H+ also gets used by the OH-. Hence the weak acid is ultimately forced to keep ionising until all the OH- is gone. So ultimately the H+ gets forced into ionising completely because the base is strong and is, in a way, "hydroxide abundant"

wesadora

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 88
  • School: Arden
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1172 on: November 01, 2016, 02:43:19 pm »
0
ohhhhhhhh! So they strong reagent forces the other to ionise more than it normally would, so a complete neutralisation can occur? And the only that changes is the equivalence point (e.g. weak acid strong base ph at equiv. > 7).
legends
Subjects: 3U Maths, Adv. English, Chemistry, Geography, PDHPE

kimmie

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St Marys Senior High School
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1173 on: November 01, 2016, 03:08:51 pm »
0
Hey for these types of Qs, how do you know that 0.16 turns to -0.16?
I uploaded what I did but the answer is 1.20 V






wesadora

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 88
  • School: Arden
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1174 on: November 01, 2016, 03:34:19 pm »
0
Hey for these types of Qs, how do you know that 0.16 turns to -0.16?
I uploaded what I did but the answer is 1.20 V

(Image removed from quote.)



(Image removed from quote.)

remember, the table is of standard reduction potentials. Since SO2 is being oxidised, its -0.16V (reduction potential of SO42- is 0.16V, as you read off the table, but in this case the reaction is SO2 being oxidised (backwards reaction to what's shown on your reduction table- so SO2 + 2H2O --> SO42- + 4H+ + 2e-...and so you flip the sign and it's -0.16V). 1.36V + (-0.16V) = 1.2
« Last Edit: November 01, 2016, 03:36:25 pm by wesadora »
Subjects: 3U Maths, Adv. English, Chemistry, Geography, PDHPE

JemexR

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1175 on: November 01, 2016, 04:20:34 pm »
0
Just a quick converting question

How do you convert mg/L -> mL?

It is the 2009 Multiple choice Q 15

https://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2009exams/pdf_doc/2009-hsc-exam-chemistry.pdf

ProfLayton2000

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Baulkham Hills High
  • School Grad Year: 2017
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1176 on: November 01, 2016, 04:21:56 pm »
0
Is it true that nuclear reactors are used to make radioisotopes with atomic number <= 95 and accelerators (cyclotrons and linear accelerators) make radioisotopes with atomic number > 95?

wesadora

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 88
  • School: Arden
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1177 on: November 01, 2016, 04:42:28 pm »
0
Just a quick converting question

How do you convert mg/L -> mL?

It is the 2009 Multiple choice Q 15

https://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2009exams/pdf_doc/2009-hsc-exam-chemistry.pdf

for that question, you gotta convert mg/L to mg/10L (as per the Q) and so times mg by 10. Convert mg to g (times by 0.001). use n=m/M to find number of moles (M = molar mass of oxygen, m = mass of oxygen in grams, which you worked out before).
Then, use V = n x 24.79, to find the volume in Litres. Convert Literes to mL. It's tricky, and not a straight conversion - but that's the process and it just requires you to know how your equations all link together REAAAALLY well. :P
Subjects: 3U Maths, Adv. English, Chemistry, Geography, PDHPE

wesadora

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 88
  • School: Arden
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1178 on: November 01, 2016, 04:50:04 pm »
0
Is it true that nuclear reactors are used to make radioisotopes with atomic number <= 95 and accelerators (cyclotrons and linear accelerators) make radioisotopes with atomic number > 95?
Nuclear reactors are used for neutron bombardment, which can be used for elements up to atomic number 98 (californium). Accelerators can be used for ANYTHING - you can make commercial radioisotopes less than atomic number 95 in linear accelerators, e.g. Nitrogen-14 + Helium-4 --> Fluorine-18. But, you can also use them to collide larger nuclei to make super large nucleuses (and pretty much all transuranic elements) beyond atomic number 98 that can't be produced in nuclear reactors (by neutron bombardment).
Subjects: 3U Maths, Adv. English, Chemistry, Geography, PDHPE

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1179 on: November 01, 2016, 04:50:29 pm »
0

Is it true that nuclear reactors are used to make radioisotopes with atomic number <= 95 and accelerators (cyclotrons and linear accelerators) make radioisotopes with atomic number > 95?
You can use whatever you want to make <=95 but for >95 you're bombarding too many protons and you're kinda forced to use accelerators. Because how are you going to get some element with atomic number 113 to stay there without decaying whilst you bombard with neutrons.

Though nuclear reactors would be more common than accelerators for <=95 I suppose

JemexR

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1180 on: November 01, 2016, 05:34:25 pm »
0
For Q 18 of the 2010 paper, why is the answer C?

https://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2010exams/pdf_doc/2010-hsc-exam-chemistry.pdf

For D : When the Ammonium and Chloride dissociate, wouldn't the positively charged ammonium ion ionise with the hydroxide in the water, creating water and ammonia?

And for HSC 2006 Q8, given that they have the same concentration, wouldn't that mean that they are equally dilute/concentrated?

https://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams/hsc2006exams/pdf_doc/chemistry_06.pdf
« Last Edit: November 01, 2016, 05:53:27 pm by JemexR »

proficles

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: 0
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1181 on: November 01, 2016, 06:22:57 pm »
0
Hi, this 2005 question has the answer as B, which i agree with. However i don't understand why option D is wrong, do electrons not flow through the voltmeter? Thanks in advance :)

kimmie

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St Marys Senior High School
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1182 on: November 01, 2016, 06:45:15 pm »
0
Hey for this, I understand it's an exothermic reaction so the answer can be B or D only but how is the answer D? Do we look at the moles or something?



lha

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Lambton High School
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1183 on: November 01, 2016, 06:53:19 pm »
0
Just wondering, what raw mark do you have to get for it to scale to 90?

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: Chemistry Question Thread
« Reply #1184 on: November 01, 2016, 07:20:57 pm »
0
Just wondering, what raw mark do you have to get for it to scale to 90?
Use the raw marks database to see historic data.