Login | Register

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 14, 2020, 12:43:37 am

Author Topic: Was it me or this year's Bio exam was rather more abstract?  (Read 768 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

atar beta

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Was it me or this year's Bio exam was rather more abstract?
« on: November 13, 2019, 05:55:03 pm »
0

Compared to the previous years, the 2019 VCAA bio exam was rather..... weird.
Hardly any 'hard' content on the study design was featured on it.
There was a lot of thinking questions, like the economic and social factor for zika spreading or the frozen steppe bison question.
A lot of them I found were rather open ended.

What was your opinions on the exam?

Erutepa

  • VIC MVP - 2019
  • Moderator
  • Forum Leader
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
  • evenin'
  • Respect: +690
Re: Was it me or this year's Bio exam was rather more abstract?
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2019, 06:11:08 pm »
+4
Compared to the previous years, the 2019 VCAA bio exam was rather..... weird.
Hardly any 'hard' content on the study design was featured on it.
There was a lot of thinking questions, like the economic and social factor for zika spreading or the frozen steppe bison question.
A lot of them I found were rather open ended.

What was your opinions on the exam?
I agree - I didn't think that there was much hard content content questions. I think there were a couple question where it was hard for me to justify 4 marks for (such as the BMP4 question and the Fossilisation question) and I think the vaccine against allergens was an application question that may have tripped up quite a few people.
I am not sure if you are aware, but you can find more discussion about the exam here https://atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=188419.0
Qualifications
 > Have counted to 227
 > Can draw really good spiders
 > 2 Poet points
 > 6.5 insanipi points
 > 1 Bri MT point

Sine

  • National Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4270
  • Respect: +1365
Re: Was it me or this year's Bio exam was rather more abstract?
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2019, 11:02:46 pm »
+6
Compared to the previous years, the 2019 VCAA bio exam was rather..... weird.
Hardly any 'hard' content on the study design was featured on it.
There was a lot of thinking questions, like the economic and social factor for zika spreading or the frozen steppe bison question.
A lot of them I found were rather open ended.

What was your opinions on the exam?
I think for quite a few years now VCAA has made an effort at moving from a definition/memory-based testing into more application/understanding style questions which really need people to think - rather than just regurgitating information that they have memorised. E.g. in 2014 I don't think there was single questions that students needed to actually think about or have a though process - it was basically whether they knew it or not which yielded a very high A+ cutoff of 96/110 (87%).

Genshai

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Respect: +5
Re: Was it me or this year's Bio exam was rather more abstract?
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2019, 09:27:12 pm »
+1
yeah, i found this years exam unlike any other vcaa bio exam i had done (or any trial exams from other organisations). People said it was easy, but i was kinda unprepared for the questions. i guess i should have prepared better ahah !! from what i gather, a lot of the exams this year were 'weird' - many of friends experienced similar problems in psych, legal, vis comm etc.
2019: Biology [40]
2020: English, Methods, Revolutions, Chemistry, Psych