FREE lectures this September + October | HSC Head Start + Exam Revision: book here | QCE Head Start: book here | VCE Exam Revision: book here

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 16, 2019, 08:18:37 am

Author Topic: Human Genome Editing Survey  (Read 454 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

allyyanyan

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: +4
Re: Human Genome Editing Survey
« Reply #15 on: September 09, 2019, 07:11:46 pm »
0
Did your survey look at religious views? I think I remember it doing so but I could be wrong...

Yes it did!

turinturambar

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 171
  • TÚRIN TURAMBAR DAGNIR GLAURUNGA
  • Respect: +112
Re: Human Genome Editing Survey
« Reply #16 on: September 09, 2019, 10:11:39 pm »
+1
Wow! At the minute I'm looking at the ethics of stem cell research and human cloning for my religion and society class and came to many similar conclusions. On the whole, people are a lot more willing to accept medical uses of these sciences but are resistant to using them for cosmetic reasons.

If I recall correctly, in Homo Deus Yuval Harari Noah argued that most things with a potential downside (such as gene editing, cybernetics, AI, probably a bunch of others) would be unable to be stopped, because we couldn't justify blocking medical research, but once the research is done it won't just be limited to positive uses (cosmetics is mostly neutral, but he talked about examples like building a better soldier).  Made sense to me.
In western lands beneath the Sun
the flowers may rise in Spring,
the trees may bud, the waters run,
the merry finches sing.

laura_

  • MOTM: JUNE 19
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 619
  • happy, free, confused and lonely at the same time
  • Respect: +276
Re: Human Genome Editing Survey
« Reply #17 on: September 10, 2019, 06:31:49 am »
+1
If I recall correctly, in Homo Deus Yuval Harari Noah argued that most things with a potential downside (such as gene editing, cybernetics, AI, probably a bunch of others) would be unable to be stopped, because we couldn't justify blocking medical research, but once the research is done it won't just be limited to positive uses (cosmetics is mostly neutral, but he talked about examples like building a better soldier).  Made sense to me.
Yeah. The thought of AI soldiers terrifies me. Once a country does not have to risk any lives to attack another, the nature of war changes significantly.
give like the sun and the whole world grows tall - atticus

https://www.surveylegend.com/s/1nik