Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

December 13, 2019, 05:25:05 am

Author Topic: A Thread For Questions  (Read 5869 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nullisecundus

  • Guest
Re: A Thread For Questions
« Reply #90 on: March 14, 2010, 10:12:24 am »
0
yeah i only realised that electronencephalograph showed function after the sac ..
as it is grouped with the other ones that show structure in the grivas book..

would PET s till be considered correct as the question stated 'relatively uninvasive',
or else it wouldnt have said relative, since fMRI and EEG arent invasive at all?

sillysmile

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • :>
  • Respect: +11
Re: A Thread For Questions
« Reply #91 on: March 14, 2010, 10:40:17 am »
0
yeah i only realised that electronencephalograph showed function after the sac ..
as it is grouped with the other ones that show structure in the grivas book..

would PET s till be considered correct as the question stated 'relatively uninvasive',
or else it wouldnt have said relative, since fMRI and EEG arent invasive at all?
yeah possibly
2010: Biology 37+   Literature 25+    Physical ed 36+   Psychology 44+
ATAR: 80+ and I will be happy.
2011: Psychological science @LaTrobe (bundoora campus)

"Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been"-- Mark Twain

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1661
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: A Thread For Questions
« Reply #92 on: March 14, 2010, 12:32:55 pm »
0
yeah i only realised that electronencephalograph showed function after the sac ..
as it is grouped with the other ones that show structure in the grivas book..

would PET s till be considered correct as the question stated 'relatively uninvasive',
or else it wouldnt have said relative, since fMRI and EEG arent invasive at all?

Well, one of things about PET scans is that you can't just keep doing it continuously, because of the radioactive glucose. To be honest, I don't think you'll be able to get that question right.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.