FREE lectures this July. Places booking out fast. HSC: book here. VCE: book here.

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 19, 2019, 05:19:14 am

Author Topic: VCE English Question Thread  (Read 349017 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

alanihale

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • i still haven't taken my L's yet :(
  • Respect: +8
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2475 on: May 05, 2019, 12:08:18 pm »
0
Can anybody help me understand what on earth the contention of this cartoon is?? I'm not sure where it sits and what it's trying to do/show?
https://www.inkcinct.com.au/web-pages/cartoons/2019/2019-159P--Paleo-restaurant-vegan-protest,-cave-man---AUSTRALIA-8th-April.png
(it's in relation to the vegan protests in melb - the other two articles are pro-veganism but only one of them is critical of their methods)
Thanks!
2018 - Further Maths [44]
2019 - English | Spesh | Methods | Chem | Bio

---

If one dream should fall and break into a thousand pieces, never be afraid to pick one of those pieces up and begin again." -Flavia Weedn

NomotivationF

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Serial procrastinator
  • Respect: +28
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2476 on: May 05, 2019, 12:20:27 pm »
0
Hey. For discuss questions, I know you're not meant to completely agree nor disagree with the topic, but does that mean you always have to discuss why it is true/untrue to an extent? Or can you just explore the prompt itself and indirectly agree with it?
For example, in EvangelionZeta's A Farewell To Arms text response, they do not talk about whether the prompt is true or false to an extent, but rather explore the prompt itself (and sort of indirectly agree with it).

Also for most of the sample essay examples in the english resources thread, they do not mention metalanguage or the author's intent which I've been told is important. Is it just because they're like 10 years old or is it not required to incorporate those kinds of things in text responses?

My English teacher has told me that when a discuss question is asked, most of the time they want you to fully agree with the statement. However, if the statement given is outrageously wrong, you can almost create your own contention that disagrees with the statement provided and go on to write an essay fully disagreeing with the topic
My journey through VCE

2018 - Accounting [42], Further Maths [44]
2019 (Aims)- English [~37], Economics [~40], Psychology [~45], Maths methods [25+]
2020-2024 (Hopefully) - Bachelor of Commerce/Science @Monash

NomotivationF

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Serial procrastinator
  • Respect: +28
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2477 on: May 05, 2019, 12:25:23 pm »
0
Can anybody help me understand what on earth the contention of this cartoon is?? I'm not sure where it sits and what it's trying to do/show?
https://www.inkcinct.com.au/web-pages/cartoons/2019/2019-159P--Paleo-restaurant-vegan-protest,-cave-man---AUSTRALIA-8th-April.png
(it's in relation to the vegan protests in melb - the other two articles are pro-veganism but only one of them is critical of their methods)
Thanks!

Im assuming this is for language analysis. To me it seems like this article is attacking both sides by saying people that are anti-veganism are living in the past (hence the caveman). But you could also argue it to be attack vegan protesters and the way they go about protesting inside peoples restaunts or something like that. It would be easier to analyse this with the context of the article and where it sits within the article.
My journey through VCE

2018 - Accounting [42], Further Maths [44]
2019 (Aims)- English [~37], Economics [~40], Psychology [~45], Maths methods [25+]
2020-2024 (Hopefully) - Bachelor of Commerce/Science @Monash

JR_StudyEd

  • MOTM: MAY 19
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 153
  • Mental health is #1
  • Respect: +33
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2478 on: May 08, 2019, 02:48:52 pm »
0
Which of the three examinable areas of study (comparative, text response/analytical and argument analysis) is the most difficult piece to write? Which one requires the most work? (Obviously I know there won't be an objective answer to this given the fundamental subjectivity of English itself)
« Last Edit: May 08, 2019, 03:03:53 pm by JR_StudyEd »
VCE Class of 2019
Subjects: English, Psychology (2018), Maths Methods, Chemistry, Biology, Health and Human Development

ErnieTheBirdi

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Respect: 0
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2479 on: May 11, 2019, 08:09:53 pm »
0
Hey, I was wondering if anyone could help me with how to write and possibly ACE a language analysis? I would like to know, in what ways I could improve on language analysis and how to write it well enough to get high marks. Also, I have an English tutor that tells me to write a language analysis one way and my teacher at school tells me to do it differently, what should I do? Thankyou

OZLexico

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • Respect: +7
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2480 on: May 13, 2019, 11:07:49 am »
0
This seems really tough that you seem to be getting conflicting advice.  I think you should have another  look at your previous language analysis writing and your teacher's assessment comments.  What do they say is the weakness in your writing?  This will give your tutor something to focus on too.  You can always go back to your teacher and have a session with them so they can give you more advice about possible improvements.   Otherwise I'd suggest lots of practice analysis pieces - there are lots to choose from here on the Language Analysis Club bit, or you can look for your own examples (short ones like letters to the editor can be found on the sites of online newspapers).     

callum123

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Respect: 0
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2481 on: May 14, 2019, 07:18:11 pm »
+3
Hey, I was wondering if anyone could help me with how to write and possibly ACE a language analysis? I would like to know, in what ways I could improve on language analysis and how to write it well enough to get high marks. Also, I have an English tutor that tells me to write a language analysis one way and my teacher at school tells me to do it differently, what should I do? Thankyou

My main advice for Language Analysis is to follow the WHAT-HOW-WHY process of analysis!
What is the author doing (identify the persuasive technique, quote her)
How does this position the audience to feel?
Why does the author want the audience to feel this way (what part of the contention is being pushed?

Another top tip is to be SPECIFIC with your discussion! Pick a quote and discuss what THAT quote is doing- not just all rhetorical questions in general!
Good luck!

gary123

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Respect: +1
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2482 on: June 12, 2019, 11:26:22 pm »
0
hi i just want to get some sort of explicit confirmation as to whether what my teacher expects in an la essay is true
basically if you are two or more texts, you have to focus on comparing the texts ie comparative analysis so he completely opposes blocking and wants integration structure. He used the 2016 vcaa report where there was an example of students offering 'astute insights' through comparison. Even though he references this he ignores the fact that there is no 'explicit expectation' to do this.
The criteria for our sac emphasised on how we compared the two texts given and I used block so I'm definitely not getting the mark i want.
the way he insists on his view makes me think i've been approaching la wrong but i doubt it since the task is to analyse langauge not compare.
Could I get some clarification on this for the end of year exam please? Is it okay to use blocking since its the most convenient for two or more articles?
Thanks

Matthew_Whelan

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Changing your perception can transcend reality.
  • Respect: +4
Re: VCE English Question Thread
« Reply #2483 on: June 13, 2019, 12:24:18 am »
+2
hi i just want to get some sort of explicit confirmation as to whether what my teacher expects in an la essay is true
basically if you are two or more texts, you have to focus on comparing the texts ie comparative analysis so he completely opposes blocking and wants integration structure. He used the 2016 vcaa report where there was an example of students offering 'astute insights' through comparison. Even though he references this he ignores the fact that there is no 'explicit expectation' to do this.
The criteria for our sac emphasised on how we compared the two texts given and I used block so I'm definitely not getting the mark i want.
the way he insists on his view makes me think i've been approaching la wrong but i doubt it since the task is to analyse langauge not compare.
Could I get some clarification on this for the end of year exam please? Is it okay to use blocking since its the most convenient for two or more articles?
Thanks

This is just my opinion of course, but i think the integrated style works more effectively when there are two or more things to discuss. The opportunity for comparison is looking at how the authors have similar/different contentions, or the way they attempt to persuade, even compare their different audiences.
By comparing these features you show a better understanding of how they are both attempting to persuade. I think an integrated approach allows for side by side contrast which helps with this. A block approach can be effective but is less sophisticated (usually) than the integrated.

However, usually it's just one 'main' article and one or more smaller segments (comment or cartoon, ect) which means you mostly focus on one piece anyway. Points of comparison would be when you analyse a sub topic of the issue at hand that is addressed by both pieces.
Personally I break my paragraphs down by points of discussion (sub-arguments/topics) then analyse the langauge used to convey those points by the authors, and the subsequent effect.
Overall, to appease your teacher I'd stick with what he wants, but on the exam I'd expect them to be less fussed.
2018: Psychology [35]
2019: English, Methods, Chemistry, Biology, Physics