Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 20, 2024, 01:56:05 pm

Author Topic: Variable interval vs Variable ratio - extinction  (Read 11701 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Felicity Wishes

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 731
  • Respect: +43
  • School: Mater Christi College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Variable interval vs Variable ratio - extinction
« Reply #30 on: November 03, 2012, 05:15:22 pm »
0
Been to lectures, and from past exams as learning has been on exams for ages, variable ratio is deffinitely most resistant to extinction
Yup. :) I thought we already established this earlier in the thread..
Psychology and psychophysiology (Swinburne)

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Variable interval vs Variable ratio - extinction
« Reply #31 on: November 03, 2012, 05:28:11 pm »
0
Ok sorry to be a pain, but one more clarification:
From most to least resistant to extinction:
- Variable ratio
- Variable interval
- Fixed ratio
- Fixed interval
- Continuous schedule

From highest to lowest rate of responding: (where does continuous fall?)
- Variable ratio
- Fixed ratio
- Fixed interval
- Variable interval

Best for acquisition: Continuous schedule
Best for maintenance: Partial reinforcement

Pleeease correct me if I'm wrong!!
I think they both sound right; they make more sense to me than some of the suggestions. But I'm not sure where continuous is for the second either - not that it's likely we'll be tested on that.

Can someone explain to me why partial schedules of reinforcement are less susceptible to extinction than continuous ones? :)
« Last Edit: November 03, 2012, 05:38:02 pm by Genericname2365 »
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM