Question 3a was a bit counterintuitive as you wouldn't expect the correct answers to be right at first glance, it looked really messy. Of course, it simplifies later in the question, but the southern hemisphere exams, particularly in the early questions, tend to work with cleaner numbers to assure students they're on the right track (not always though). They also should've split it into ai and aii for the two different solutions, it's weird and clunky otherwise, held me up for a second trying to specify my two separate answers.
Question 6a was worded horribly. It says Jacinta observes "a head on the first two tosses". Does that mean she observes one head on the first two, hence the usage of "a"? Does that mean she observes a head on BOTH of the first two tosses? Can it be one OR two? Really poor phrasing there, my class took it today and it tripped up more than a few of us.
I honestly can't think of a better way to question 7c. It was a kind of cool question actually, but held back by the fact that it's really difficult to express unless they did a previous question which established what they were talking about when they said "express in terms of A(a), for a specific value of a". Another problem with the question is that you could have technically used ANY value of a and then worked the expression around it by calculating the integral from scratch, which doesn't contribute to the difficulty of the exam, but the stupidity of it.
8b had nowhere NEAR enough space to properly "show that". It's pretty clear they just wanted you to write out the expression and go "and that simplifies to the given expression lol", which is obviously ridiculous that students are expected to decipher how much working out VCAA wants you to do without any real specification.
8c was a really good differentiating question, I think. Doubt they'd do something that hard on the southern hemisphere exam, though.
It's definitely the hardest VCAA exam 1 from southern or northern hemisphere imo, so I wouldn't stress over it too much.