So I checked in with Law students services today, just to scope out what chance I had of transferring with a summer semester unit to make up 48 credit points. Apparently - and I got the staff member to doublecheck with another attendant, in addition to arts student services straight after - so long as I have the required average, and my failed unit was a language (or, for example, a maths or engineering or biology unit; something barely indicative of law performance), they are able to make an exception to the 48 credit points thing. The basis for that revelation was that the reviews are done individually, so it's somewhat at the discretion of the person reviewing my submission. To quote - they can't guarantee entry, but wouldn't discourage me from applying anyway as I still have a chance.
Now I'm not totally sure about this, even after chasing it up with multiple people, so I was wondering if anyone on here had anecdotal evidence consistent with this? (i.e., "my friend only had 42 credit points and transferred across") Because that would really make my year. If they review the applications on a case-by-case basis, then surely 7 (the arrogance) HDs in subjects with essays + 1 fail in an introductory language unit couldn't totally preclude me from transfer. Could it?
Oh, and can confirm j-awad's thing about them not using WAM.
Also, to all my Arts/Law 2015 hopefuls, how are we all going?
Hanging in there.