Thanks for the clarification! And with regards to essay type, I guess an original work? (don't know if this is the correct descriptor - always thought uni essays were all the same thing - but we basically have to formulate an argument and argue it) We've been given a range of essay questions to choose from, and and the one I chose focuses on the relationship between language and power.
Also, what do mean by writing in passive voice being "context dependent"? Like, does it depend on the topic you're talking about (e.g very conceptual topics it would makes sense in write in passive, whereas in others that discuss the effects of something, active would be more appropriate) or whatever one floats your marker's boat?
Edit: I have another question if you don't mind: which is better (in terms of workload and easiness) - broad or narrow essay questions?
Hey, sorry for the late reply. My thoughts:
* University essays definitely aren't all the same thing - in fact, they vary very greatly! Even within areas of study (so like, Linguistics, which is within the school of Languages, Literatures, Cultures and Linguistics, which is in the Faculty of Arts etc.), essays can differ a lot. Perhaps even within individual units!
* Sounds like a cool essay topic.
* I can't see why it would be a strict requirement to use passive voice for such an essay. I think just whatever flows more appropriately would be suitable. This is what I meant by "context-dependent" - not so much the content matter, but just the way in which you write. There's no inherently better way of writing in terms of active/passive, I don't think, although I personally find continued passive to be grating.
* Better in workload? Hard to answer, and honestly I don't think there
is an answer to this. Narrow is good because you have specificity; broad is good because you have possibility. Seems a very personal thing to me!