Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 20, 2024, 10:21:20 am
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: VCAA SHORT ANSWER 2009 Q4??? WHY NOT INTERFERENCE?  (Read 616 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

matt123

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1653
  • Strive.
  • Respect: +6
VCAA SHORT ANSWER 2009 Q4??? WHY NOT INTERFERENCE?
« on: November 03, 2010, 11:15:15 am »
0
hey guys

VCAA 2009
SA QUESTION 4

i dont like it.
why cant you say "interference" occurred with group 2? thus Group one recalled better?
I heard lots of people said this .. why cant it be correct too?
Logged
2009 : Physical Education
2010  ATAR : 91.45 , Bio , Chem , Methods , Psychology , English
Completed VCE at the age of 16.
2011 : Bachelor of pharmacy
2012 : Hopefully med? " crosses fingers"

matt123

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1653
  • Strive.
  • Respect: +6
Re: VCAA SHORT ANSWER 2009 Q4??? WHY NOT INTERFERENCE?
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2010, 11:28:30 am »
0
.?
Logged
2009 : Physical Education
2010  ATAR : 91.45 , Bio , Chem , Methods , Psychology , English
Completed VCE at the age of 16.
2011 : Bachelor of pharmacy
2012 : Hopefully med? " crosses fingers"

coolhat

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 86
  • Respect: +1
Re: VCAA SHORT ANSWER 2009 Q4??? WHY NOT INTERFERENCE?
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2010, 11:33:36 am »
0
if u read the question, it says two groups of participants studied a list of words under one of two ENCODING CONDITIONS. this relates more to rehearsal than the interference theory!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up