Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 20, 2024, 03:08:01 pm

Author Topic: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament  (Read 13255 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« on: November 27, 2016, 09:51:47 pm »
+6

Welcome to the tournament of 2016! This year we had 14 people voice interest in this event and things are going to be a tiny bit too crazy! We (insanipi and myself) are going to hold this event as realistically and fairly as we can so that we can promote the competition however have a good time as well! :)

This year, the event has been divided into two phases; one round robin and one knockout phase. There is a chance that we might need to crawl into 2017... but let's hope not.

Here are the rules and how this will run.

Submitting an Outcome
All submissions are to be made to insanipi or myself. You're allowed to submit the result as a comment here if you want but just make sure your opponent gives you permission to do so :P

Requirement to claim a win
The winner must submit one of the following to claim a win, clearly stating which players were involved:
1. A PNG file of the game
2. The moves of the game as well as details about who played what colour.
3. A screenshot showing the final position and the final few moves

Requirement to claim a draw
Any one player just needs to message that the game was drawn by _________
The blank can be either agreement, threefold repetition, fifty-move rule, stalemate or any other legitimate method of drawing.

Round Robin Phase
You will schedule to play all (13) other opponents by yourselves. You must finish your games before Mon 12 Dec. at 12 noon sharp.

We apologise that we have chosen not to use either chess.com or lichess for their preplanned tournament modes. The necessity of getting a membership on chess.com is just not worth the fun and lichess requires everyone to be online all at once, which is expecting far too much for 14 players.

Time on the clock
As far as we're concerned, we are happy for the time controls to be decided among yourselves for the round robin stage. However if this poses problems, we will make these 10 minute games with +5 second increments.

Tallying the points
A spreadsheet has been made for insanipi's and my use. We will update the spreadsheet ASAP when we receive an outcome of a game. You can find a link to the spreadsheet here. Occasionally if I remember to, I will also upload a screenshot of the spreadsheet at a certain time to save some effort.

Note that the scoring works as thus:
1 - Win
0.5 - Draw
0 - Loss

Black or White?
You will notice that some boxes have been shaded grey. For the box shaded grey, the name to the left (i.e. not above) that box is playing that colour.

Examples:
For the game E6P V.S. brenden, E6P will be playing white.
For the game heidi V.S. qaszer, heidi will be playing black

Table: Final ver.

Note that the red font indicates games which were played, not abandoned/forfeited.

What happens if one of my opponents and I don't get a game going?
You're given essentially two weeks to play all the games. That's basically one person a day on average, so it should be fine. Here are the guidelines for if things don't go to plan

Could not have all games
1. You both tried your absolute best, but couldn't get something happening
If there's a genuine reason as to why something has hindered both of you, that's fine. We can negotiate something. Or alternatively you can choose to draw by agreement

2. You simply don't want to play anymore
Well, ok. But you basically get 0

3. You asked your opponent to play a game, but they simply never responded to you
For a few days, you'll just sit through this. However, on Sun 11 Dec. at 8 PM if they still have not replied, you may claim a win by forfeit. To claim a win by forfeit, you simply need to send a screenshot of every instance where you messaged someone for a game, but received no reply.

Note - You must claim the forfeit in this scenario. If you do not claim a forfeit, both players will be given 0, not 0.5
Best way to guarantee you have this right (if your opponent backs out) is just to send PMs to invite everyone to a match ASAP. That way you have the convincing message there to claim the forfeit when the time comes.

The top 8 players advance to the knockout stage.

Knockout Phase
You will once again schedule. However, since we start on the quarter finals (i.e. you play for at most 3 rounds) you'll be given less time to play - at most a week to schedule your game.

Times on the clock
All games will be of 15 minutes long, with +10 second increments. The time control is more lenient here because we want to give players more of a chance to focus here, than to hurry.

Setting up the tree diagram
The quarter-finals were seeded so that the players who attained 1st and 2nd place would not be able to meet until the grand finals. The remaining six contestants have been randomly seeded due to the fact many games were not played. Information regarding the randomised seeding can be found in the spoiler
Seeding method
First, the names of the 6 contestants were assigned a number from 1 to 6 via Random.org, to which the first outcome was taken. The following list was obtained.
1 HPL
2 TheCommando
3 J41
4 insanipi
5 Specter
6 brenden

Then, on R, a code was run to generate 6 distinct lots of 100 pseudo-random numbers, taken out of a standard normal distribution. The values in each group were summed, as seen in the code:
Code: [Select]
(c(sum(rnorm(100)),sum(rnorm(100)),sum(rnorm(100)),sum(rnorm(100)),sum(rnorm(100)),sum(rnorm(100)))->vector)
The following output was received on the first try:
Code: [Select]
[1]   0.17844090 -11.43650192  -6.97773034   6.62419514  -0.06796487   5.59268803
The position of each element of the vector "vector" corresponds to the number each individual received. This means, that the number  0.17844090 corresponds to HPL.

Names on the tree diagram are listed from top to bottom, including the names of the top 2 players. However, we will pretend the top two players do not exist.

The smaller the number assigned to the person, the higher they are listed on the spreadsheet. Effectively, excluding the top 2 players, the vector (of sums) was used to give each player a random position on the spreadsheet, from top, to bottom.
(As an aside, sort(vector) was used to arrange the sequence in ascending order)

This means, that from top to bottom, the players were ultimately seeded as thus:
4 HPL
1 TheCommando
2 J41
6 insanipi
3 Specter
5 brenden

The tree can be accessed in page 2 of the spreadsheet, used to record the results of the round-robin. It can also be accessed below.
Tree

Additional submission requirements - Semi finals and Grand final only
For the quarter-finals, there will only be one game, you will follow the same submission procedure.

However, the semi-finals will be a best-2-out-of-3 scheme. The grand-finals will be best-4-out-of-5. This allows the players multiple chances to play, as well as reduce the disadvantage of playing a colour not preferred too often. It also forces the contestants to work harder for the win :P
(Note that colours are to alternate for successive games. lichess does this for you if you use the rematch option)

Draws are again, to be counted as worth 0.5 in value. If after 1, 3 or 5 games (depending on which phase) the score is tied, the players must keep going until the first decisive game is achieved.

The winner will submit what's necessary for all games (including draws and losses) if RuiAce and insanipi are both unable to spectate the game. If either one of them is online to spectate, no submission will be necessary and the results of the games will be stored by us.

Black or white?
For the quarter finals, in all games the player listed above is playing white. e.g. Brenden will be playing white against insanipi.

Once we're at the semi-finals, both players will get at least one chance at each colour. However, there's the issue of who gets what colour first. This will probably be done, again, by code.

For the grand final, insanipi will be doing 5 coin tosses to determine who gets what colour first.

What if my opponent backed out here?
Guidelines are the same as for the knockout phase. Evidence MUST be present showing that you have tried to arrange a game (a screenshot serves as the best proof). The first player to submit the claim on forfeiture advances to the next round.

Note that if neither player submits, both players will be disqualified.

Good luck and enjoy yourselves :)

P.S. I'm really sorry about the inconvenience with the round robin phase. Both insanipi and I agreed that having the phase is suitable as we lack players to properly host a round-of-16, else two random players get to skip a round. It was the biggest compromise I felt was possible.

One last thing
Any queries/concerns can be posted here or alternatively you can shoot a PM to either myself (insanipi) or Rui. ^_^

Moderator Action (insanipi): Added additional spoiler at the end. :)
« Last Edit: December 13, 2016, 09:15:30 pm by RuiAce »

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2016, 09:05:56 am »
+3
It inspires me, how seriously Rui takes Chess.

#callmemagnus
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10150
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2016, 09:50:43 am »
+3
Requirement to claim a win
The winner must submit one of the following to claim a win, clearly stating which players were involved:
1. A PNG file of the game
2. The moves of the game as well as details about who played what colour.
3. A screenshot showing the final position and the final few moves

Do we need to submit it to Turnitin for plagiarism detection? ;)

sweetiepi

  • National Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • "A Bit of Chaos" (she/they)
  • Respect: +3589
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2016, 09:52:47 am »
0
Do we need to submit it to Turnitin for plagiarism detection? ;)
I'd be surprised if Rui says no :P
2017-2019: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Formulation Science)
2020: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Honours) Read my uni journey here!

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2016, 10:15:50 am »
0
Do we need to submit it to Turnitin for plagiarism detection? ;)
I'd be surprised if Rui says no :P
Smh :P


qazser

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
  • Respect: +23
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2016, 11:27:36 am »
0
Anyone up for a tourney game?

Msg me:

Lichess: ANqazser
AN Chat: Hop On!

2016:Methods[   ]

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2016, 11:36:11 am »
0
Anyone up for a tourney game?

Msg me:

Lichess: ANqazser
Check inbox :)


Also, oh right:
Lichess: acercross

heids

  • Supreme Stalker
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2429
  • Respect: +1632
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2016, 02:02:42 pm »
0
NOTE: I think I voiced interest, seriously meant to join in, but have to back out :(
VCE (2014): HHD, Bio, English, T&T, Methods

Uni (2021-24): Bachelor of Nursing @ Monash Clayton

Work: PCA in residential aged care

qazser

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
  • Respect: +23
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2016, 02:32:06 pm »
+3
[Event "Casual game"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/RcgXH9TP"]
[Date "2016.11.28"]
[White "Anonymous"]
[Black "acercross"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "1500"]
[PlyCount "65"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "900+10"]
[ECO "B50"]
[Opening "Sicilian Defense"]
[Termination "Normal"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 { B50 Sicilian Defense } 3. Nc3 e5 4. Bb5+ Nc6 5. d3 Nf6 6. Bc4 Be7 7. h3 O-O 8. a4 Na5 9. Ba2 Bd7 10. Nh4 a6 11. Nf5 Bxf5 12. exf5 d5 13. f4? { (0.34 → -0.66) Mistake. Best move was Bg5. } (13. Bg5 d4 14. Bxf6 Bxf6 15. Ne4 Rc8 16. Qe2 c4 17. Bxc4 Nxc4 18. dxc4 Be7 19. O-O Qd7) 13... e4 14. g4?! { (-0.63 → -1.17) Inaccuracy. Best move was dxe4. } (14. dxe4 d4 15. Nd5 Nxe4 16. O-O Bh4 17. Qf3 Re8 18. f6 Nxf6 19. Nxf6+ Bxf6 20. Bd2 Nc6) 14... Nc6? { (-1.17 → 0.55) Mistake. Best move was exd3. } (14... exd3 15. cxd3 d4 16. Ne2 Nd5 17. O-O Bh4 18. Bd2 Ne3 19. Bxe3 dxe3 20. d4 cxd4 21. Qxd4) 15. g5 Nd7?! { (0.63 → 1.37) Inaccuracy. Best move was exd3. } (15... exd3 16. cxd3) 16. Bxd5 Qc7? { (1.39 → 3.06) Mistake. Best move was exd3. } (16... exd3) 17. Bxe4 Nd4?! { (2.95 → 3.69) Inaccuracy. Best move was Rae8. } (17... Rae8) 18. Nd5?! { (3.69 → 2.86) Inaccuracy. Best move was f6. } (18. f6 gxf6 19. Bxh7+ Kg7 20. Qh5 fxg5 21. fxg5 Qg3+ 22. Kd1 Qf3+ 23. Qxf3 Nxf3 24. Be4 Nde5) 18... Qd6 19. Nxe7+ Qxe7 20. Kf1?! { (2.55 → 1.62) Inaccuracy. Best move was Kf2. } (20. Kf2) 20... Rab8?? { (1.62 → 4.80) Blunder. Best move was c4. } (20... c4) 21. c3 Nc6 22. Qg4? { (4.82 → 2.66) Mistake. Best move was f6. } (22. f6) 22... Rfe8?! { (2.66 → 3.37) Inaccuracy. Best move was f6. } (22... f6 23. Kg2) 23. Be3?! { (3.37 → 2.77) Inaccuracy. Best move was f6. } (23. f6 Qd6 24. fxg7 c4 25. Qh5 Rxe4 26. dxe4 Nc5 27. Qf3 Re8 28. Kg2 Nd3 29. Be3 Kxg7) 23... b5? { (2.77 → 4.72) Mistake. Best move was f6. } (23... f6 24. Bf2 Qd6 25. h4 Rbd8 26. Rh3 Kh8 27. Re1 Qf8 28. Rhe3 Nb6 29. Bxc6 Rxe3 30. Rxe3) 24. axb5 Rxb5 25. Rxa6 Rxb2? { (4.35 → 6.10) Mistake. Best move was Ndb8. } (25... Ndb8 26. Ra2 c4 27. f6 Qb7 28. Qh4 Rxe4 29. dxe4 Rxb2 30. Rxb2 Qxb2 31. Qg4 Nd8 32. Qd1) 26. Rxc6 Rb1+?? { (6.14 → 9.31) Blunder. Best move was Nf8. } (26... Nf8 27. Ra6) 27. Kg2 Rb2+ 28. Kg3 Nb8? { (8.87 → 10.14) Mistake. Best move was f6. } (28... f6 29. Qh5) 29. Rxc5 Qa7 30. Bd4 Qa2 31. f6 g6?! { (21.95 → Mate in 10) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Best move was Re2. } (31... Re2 32. Rc8) 32. Rc8 Rf8 33. Rxf8+ { Black resigns } 1-0

Thanks for the game RuiAce,  Couldn't analyse with you, wasn't signed in :)

Qazser 1 - Ruiace 0


« Last Edit: November 28, 2016, 02:47:31 pm by qazser »
AN Chat: Hop On!

2016:Methods[   ]

Litigator

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Respect: +4
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2016, 10:36:24 am »
+1
Do we have to play our games in order or can we play whoever if they are available?

Edit: I just checked the spreadsheet and it looks like the latter option is in play. Whoever wants a game this morning, add me on chess.com (Specter_97) im down for any time control except above 30 minutes cos i otherwise i get bored and just go do stuff around my house and i forget im in game.
« Last Edit: November 29, 2016, 10:40:51 am by Specter »
vce
monash arts/business
rmit accounting/finance

sweetiepi

  • National Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • "A Bit of Chaos" (she/they)
  • Respect: +3589
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2016, 01:34:21 pm »
0
Do we have to play our games in order or can we play whoever if they are available?

Edit: I just checked the spreadsheet and it looks like the latter option is in play. Whoever wants a game this morning, add me on chess.com (Specter_97) im down for any time control except above 30 minutes cos i otherwise i get bored and just go do stuff around my house and i forget im in game.
Yup! We're playing in any order we choose! :)
2017-2019: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Formulation Science)
2020: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Honours) Read my uni journey here!

brenden

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 7185
  • Respect: +2593
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2016, 01:37:21 pm »
0
✌️just do what makes you happy ✌️

sweetiepi

  • National Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 4767
  • "A Bit of Chaos" (she/they)
  • Respect: +3589
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2016, 01:44:53 pm »
0
Oops, I totally forgot:

lichess: incywincypiAN
chess.com: incywincyspiderpi

(don't ask, I was being silly at the time :P )
« Last Edit: November 29, 2016, 02:58:42 pm by insanipi »
2017-2019: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Formulation Science)
2020: Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Science (Honours) Read my uni journey here!

Litigator

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Respect: +4
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2016, 02:38:10 pm »
+1
[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2016.11.28"]
[White "Specter_97"]
[Black "ruiace"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B90"]
[WhiteElo "1900"]
[BlackElo "1200"]
[TimeControl "600+5"]
[Termination "Game drawn by agreement"]
[CurrentPosition "8/8/6kp/2r5/5K2/7P/1R6/8 b - - 0 46"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.a4 e5 7.Nf3 Be7 8.Bc4 O-O 9.O-O Nc6 10.Be3 Be6 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.h3 d5 13.exd5 exd5 14.Bc1 d4 15.Ne2 Bc5 16.Ng3 Nd5 17.Ne4 Bb6 18.Nfg5 Qe7 19.Re1 h6 20.Nf3 Nf6 21.Nxf6+ Rxf6 22.b3 e4 23.Bb2 Rd8 24.Qe2 exf3 25.Qxe7 Nxe7 26.Rxe7 fxg2 27.Kxg2 Rf7 28.Rxf7 Kxf7 29.Rd1 g5 30.b4 Ba7 31.c3 d3 32.c4 Kg6 33.c5 Bb8 34.Bc3 Bf4 35.Bd2 Bxd2 36.Rxd2 Rd4 37.b5 Rxa4 38.bxa6 Rxa6 39.Rxd3 Rc6 40.Rd5 b5 41.f4 gxf4 42.Kf3 b4 43.Kxf4 b3 44.Rd3 b2 45.Rb3 Rxc5 46.Rxb2
1/2-1/2


I believe i made several small positional mistakes that gave ruiace control of the entire center. However, he made the mistake of keeping his queen indirectly aligned with my rook. Ill take the 0.5 haha

Thanks for the game mate
vce
monash arts/business
rmit accounting/finance

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 2016 ATAR Notes Chess Tournament
« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2016, 02:46:20 pm »
+1
Thanks for the games (to all of you who I've played so far)

With the game with qaszer 14 ... Nc6 was just a stupid move and then I didn't play accurately at all from there haha. I reckon I was a bit sharper with the game with Specter, however 26 ... fxg2 was a mistake which I saw after I played it, cause it falls to 27 Rxb7 but he didn't see it. So the instant the rooks were traded that was so drawn. Of course, you don't offer the draw if you have passed pawns though.