My research question has changed, and I removed the Newton's 2nd Law bit because my teacher told me it would be hard to keep under 2000 words.
Ahh, I see I see. That's fair.
This is my drafted research question, if you still wish to look at it:
How advantageous are airbags in cars, and technology- powered ones in motorcycles, based on the force absorbed and the impulse that triggers the airbag inflation, in preventing fatalities during a motor vehicle collision?
This is pretty good and it seems like it will be an interesting report to write.
Though, I am unsure of what you mean by "technology-powered" airbags in motorcycles. Would it make more sense to say "how advantageous are airbags in cars and motorcycles"?
While, this question is pretty good I'd recommend rearranging it for the sake of comprehension. I'd probably write it something like this:
"When investigating force absorption and the magnitude of impulse required to trigger inflation, how advantageous are airbags in cars, and technology-powered ones in motorcycles, in the prevention of fatalities during motor vehicle collisions?"
Or, removing the "technology-powered" bit:
"When investigating force absorption and the magnitude of impulse required to trigger inflation, how advantageous are airbags in cars and motorcycles, in the prevention of fatalities during motor vehicle collisions?"