For text 1: would we say "presents aren't promises" and "kisses aren't contracts" are antithetical statements that emphasise the betrayal, with the accumulation (listing almost) of lessons highlighting the extent of the impact of the discoveries?
Technically, Presents and Promises are antitheses, but when you pair them in such a way it makes sense because of the negation to recognise it as an antithetical pairing. So, I think it would be appropriate to call it that!
Im not at all sure if I meet the post requirements for this or not but Ill upload my response anyway for others but just warning anyone that i have no clue if what Ive done is good/right so be aware!!
Also I found it really beneficial doing the paper and then going on here and reading what others thought/ did similarly or differently.
So much better than when I attempt to do past trials/hsc short answers on my own and get no where because I lose confidence halfway usually because theres nowhere I can go to after for questions + help. It'd be so good if there were more, or even if everyone posted different paper 1 trials and then posted their thoughts on them.
Thanks!
Really glad to hear this! We will definitely do this again in the lead up to HSC, so I'm really glad you find this to be a better approach than doing it all on your own! I personally didn't have the discipline to do this on my own during the HSC, so I think I would've liked this kind of thing too
Im currently using the 2016 question
lets see how that goes ahah
There's no "typical AOS question" for discovery at the moment just because it's so new to testing, there's not a lot of practice papers floating around, and so it is tricky. But I suppose the beauty of this is that you are forced to look to other parts of the syllabus and prepare for what they haven't yet asked, when you're finished with the existing questions!
this juts increased my stress levels by 1000 but thanks guys now i can somewhat be prepared for 2 just in case
Just to throw something else out there. I can't find anywhere in the syllabus that says it is best practice for students to know two related texts. In fact, it has not been asked in over 10 years for two related texts, so I can hardly see that being a trend worth fighting for. Obviously, they could bring things up out of the blue and strike the entire state with madness and panic. BUT, I didn't study two related texts for Discovery, I just went in with the confidence that if they asked for two, I would use one from the unseen texts after I had begun analysing it for section one - so my work was done!