Hello, so recently I have done a SAC and our teacher has given us lots of revision work and put practice exam questions online for us as well for us that they swear is relevant to the SAC. However, when we did the SAC, we felt as if we were not prepared rightfully by our teacher for the content. I am not saying that our teacher taught us the wrong material, I watched them go through the Key Skills in the study design, but the stuff they taught was not directly revised by our teacher. The total SAC prep that I have done out of recommendation is as follows:
• 5 Assignments, totalling 70 questions that our teacher says are “super important”
• 9 Exam Papers, the questions that I did not get right or understand I did again
• Morning classes 4 times a week, our teacher gave us hard questions they said would help us with the SAC
• As well as past VCAA exams that I have printed myself and done
A lot of the practice our teacher gave us was more extended response questions, whilst the SAC had a large multiple choice for topics that we haven't covered recently.
To exemplify this, imagine the classes is learning how to throw a ball. The first, say, 3-4 lessons are on how to throw over-arm, then the next 6 weeks is on under-arm. You sign up for the baseball team to practice and your coach gives you extra drills to improve your under-arm throwing skills. Suddenly BAM! A wild SAC appears and the majority of the SAC is on over-arm throwing. Is this SAC and the preparation leading up to it on the teacher behalf wrong?
Bottom line is, can our teacher do this? What is the outcome? Do I just to suck it up and move on? What will happen to the other students, SAC, our results and the teacher? This is a year 12 SAC as well.
Thank you