Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 23, 2024, 11:01:13 pm

Author Topic: How did everyone go on the exam?  (Read 4604 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chrisjb

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • ROAR
  • Respect: +64
Re: How did everyone go on the exam?
« Reply #30 on: December 01, 2010, 04:08:04 pm »
0
What would happen if You Werent Able to list any Specific Sections of the constitution but was able to Explain how the Constitution was able to effect the question?
Would you be penalised?

Which question was this? Human rights or restrictions on the parliament?

The study design says you don't have to know the section numbers, and you don't have to use them to get full marks BUT using the section numbers sends a clear message to the examiner that you know your stuff and you have done your study in detail- and therefore they're likely to mark you better.

For the other constitution question (about restrictions on teh commonwealth) I included the section number, but for that question it's not nessicary.

The only ones you needed to know were S51, s128 and s109... and they didn't assess any of those specificly.
2011: 96.35
2012: http://www.thegapyear2012.com/
2013: Arts (Global) Monash
2016: Juris Doctor (somewhere)

LeeiieS

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: 0
Re: How did everyone go on the exam?
« Reply #31 on: December 02, 2010, 04:12:18 pm »
0
Ahh thanks I remember refering to Sections for Restrictions but did not know the actual sections instead i explained it