Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 29, 2024, 12:10:19 am

Author Topic: METHODS EXAM 2  (Read 14155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hello132

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
METHODS EXAM 2
« on: November 18, 2020, 05:35:34 pm »
What was that??

AAGlue

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2020, 05:38:33 pm »
Was anyone actually able to finish it? .o.

Isaac S

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2020, 05:44:11 pm »
What was the total area you guys got for the part of the river that was a no swim zone?

AAGlue

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2020, 05:45:50 pm »
What was the total area you guys got for the part of the river that was a no swim zone?

837 m2 ?
I did it in a rush so not too sure lol

Isaac S

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2020, 05:47:48 pm »
I got 400 something, maybe 426, not entirely sure

99.95_goal

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2020, 05:51:00 pm »
837 m2 ?
I did it in a rush so not too sure lol
Yea I got something like that

99.95_goal

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2020, 05:51:28 pm »
MC tho - tripped so bad had to guess like 1/4 of them lol

AAGlue

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2020, 05:53:17 pm »
MC tho - tripped so bad had to guess like 1/4 of them lol

SAME

Q19 made absolutely no sense TvT

BiggestVCESweat

  • Guest
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2020, 05:54:06 pm »
837 m2 ?
I did it in a rush so not too sure lol
That is what I got as well.

In regards to the exam, this exam was definitely a lot more straightforward than the previous one--didn't expect there to be such a discrepancy between the difficulty of the first and second exam.

AAGlue

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2020, 05:59:02 pm »
That is what I got as well.

In regards to the exam, this exam was definitely a lot more straightforward than the previous one--didn't expect there to be such a discrepancy between the difficulty of the first and second exam.

Really? I felt the 2019 E2 was way easier  :(
This year’s one had so many words and it was hard to understand the questions

99.95_goal

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2020, 05:59:34 pm »
That is what I got as well.

In regards to the exam, this exam was definitely a lot more straightforward than the previous one--didn't expect there to be such a discrepancy between the difficulty of the first and second exam.
It was really long tho - it's kind of like the first exam in the way that there were many questions all of medium highish difficulty so timing was really pressed

BiggestVCESweat

  • Guest
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2020, 06:11:21 pm »
Really? I felt the 2019 E2 was way easier  :(
This year’s one had so many words and it was hard to understand the questions
It was really long tho - it's kind of like the first exam in the way that there were many questions all of medium highish difficulty so timing was really pressed
I agree that this was harder than the 2019 exam and a few others, but I found that it was much easier than the 2020 exam 1. An exam like this was within my expectations, but the exam 1 was not.

tripod.77

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2020, 06:11:23 pm »
I reckon the MC's were ridiculously hard. I mean they needed TIME esp the ones towards the end.
First 2 questions for ER were good, except that one question where they asked for the value of k.

That one probability question which asked for highest and lowest possible values of y... what did ppl get for that??

Question 4 was not too bad except my n value didn't fall in the domain of 0<n<3 :(

oh yeah, last two parts to question 5, had no idea what was going on... But they were only worth 2 marks in total so...

tripod.77

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2020, 06:13:33 pm »
837 m2 ?
I did it in a rush so not too sure lol

yeah that's what I got as well.

99.95_goal

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: METHODS EXAM 2
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2020, 06:17:17 pm »
I agree that this was harder than the 2019 exam and a few others, but I found that it was much easier than the 2020 exam 1. An exam like this was within my expectations, but the exam 1 was not.
Yea - I agree with you on that, I walked out of exam 1 feeling so bad - the algebra was terrible and I made so many dumb mistakes  but exam 2 was pretty expected and CAS was used so