Despite reading every post here, I'm still really confused because there's some conflicting information.
What's the bottom line for this situation?: 80% SACs (rank 1 in cohort) + 100% exams = ? Some people here are saying 100% (100/100. i.e. 50 SS), others are saying 90% (180/200. i.e. much, much less than 50 SS, probably a 35-40).
In the first post:
"your SAC marks (so whether you got 190 or 195/200) doesn't mean anything at the end, it's just submitted for the purpose of submitting it (rankings are what matters), VCAA looks at your exam grades."
"f you full mark your Exam as Rank 1, you will get a 50, no doubt." i assume they mean despite <100% rank 1 SAC scores
While further down that post there's this:
"Full marking the exam doesn't mean much if your SACs are screwed" Huh? Do you mean if your SAC rank is screwed or if your SAC marks are screwed despite rank 1? I thought your SAC marks scale up to equal your exam marks? So even if you get 10% rank 1 for SACs and 100% for the exams, your 10% rank 1 should scale up to 100% and give you a 50 study score, right?
So what would I get for Further Math? I got 91% (rank 1) for all SACs and 37/40 (92.5%) for exam 1. If I full mark exam 2, would that mean that my SACs scale up to 100% or 96.25% (average of both exams) or 92.5% (exam 1 score) or will they stay at 91%? (I'm definitely rank 1 in my cohort for the exams as well.) I.e. what will be my GA1 score? 100%, 96.25%, 92.5% or 91%?