Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 28, 2024, 08:02:07 pm

Author Topic: Methods 3/4 Questions  (Read 5617 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Methods 3/4 Questions
« on: April 24, 2012, 11:29:43 pm »
0
(hopefully the last I'll ask about quadratic inequalities lol)

When you solve a quadratic inequality like x^2-x-6<0, you split it into two cases and
then combine the solution sets right? If one of the solution sets (for the above) is
x < -2 and x > 3, why doesn't it make sense to say that the set is (-∞, -2) U (3, ∞)
(aside from the fact that simple inspection will tell you it's wrong)?

----

And here's what kind of led me back to ^

Solve for |2x+6| - |x+3| = |x| for x

I think I've got the gist of how to solve these...
(=> is equal to greater than, lol, sorry don't have my symbols handy)

For |2x+6|
2x + 6 if x ≥ -3
-2x - 6 if x < -3

|x+3|
x+3 if x ≥ -3
-x-3 if x<-3

|x|
x if x ≥ 0
-x if x < 0

So if what I've gathered is right, you're supposed to find an x that fits in the intervals and then
solve the equation? e.g. I can't choose 2x+ 6, x+3 and x because if x can't be
greater than or equal to both 3 and 0

But what about x is less than -3 and x is less than 0? If it's less than -3 then it's also less than 0
but the equation has no solution.

Thanks
« Last Edit: April 26, 2012, 01:51:21 am by #1procrastinator »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2012, 11:47:29 pm »
0
(hopefully the last I'll ask about quadratic inequalities lol)

When you solve a quadratic inequality like x^2-x-6, you split it into two cases and
then combine the solution sets right? If one of the solution sets (for the above) is
x < -2 and x > 3, why doesn't it make sense to say that the set is (-∞, -2) U (3, ∞)
(aside from the fact that simple inspection will tell you it's wrong)?

----

And here's what kind of led me back to ^

Solve for |2x+6| - |x+3| = |x| for x

I think I've got the gist of how to solve these...
(=> is equal to greater than, lol, sorry don't have my symbols handy)

For |2x+6|
2x + 6 if x ≥ -3
-2x - 6 if x < -3

|x+3|
x+3 if x ≥ -3
-x-3 if x<-3

|x|
x if x ≥ 0
-x if x < 0

So if what I've gathered is right, you're supposed to find an x that fits in the intervals and then
solve the equation? e.g. I can't choose 2x+ 6, x+3 and x because if x can't be
greater than or equal to both 3 and 0

But what about x is less than -3 and x is less than 0? If it's less than -3 then it's also less than 0
but the equation has no solution.

Thanks
for the quadratic question, after you factorise you will get 2 factors, call them A and B

eg, A*B >0

case 1. A>0 AND B>0, so you take the intersection of the solutions from the 2 inequalities

OR

case 2. A<0 AND B<0, again you take intersection for obvious reasons ('AND')

then you take the union of case 1 and 2, since it's either case 1 OR case 2
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2012, 12:15:26 am »
+1

For |2x+6|
2x + 6 if x ≥ -3
-2x - 6 if x < -3

|x+3|
x+3 if x ≥ -3
-x-3 if x<-3

|x|
x if x ≥ 0
-x if x < 0

(Ceebz with latex, soz :P)

Following on from what you had done... therefore;

|2x + 6| - |x + 3| equals;
 
(2x + 6) - (x + 3) if x ≥ -3
(-2x - 6)-(-x - 3) if x < -3

Which consequently equals;

x + 3 if x ≥ -3
-x - 3 if x < -3

So now we're trying to find when

x + 3 if x ≥ -3
-x - 3 if x < -3

is equal to

x if x ≥ 0
-x if x < 0

We can see by the gradients that x + 3 and x will be parallel, as is the same with -x - 3 and -x, so disregard those (they won't overlap).

Now we are left with x + 3 and -x, along with -x - 3 and x.

x + 3 and -x occur for x ≥ -3 and x < 0 respectively, so they will overlap, therefore;

x + 3 = -x

2x = -3
x= -3/2

You can check the answer by |2(-3/2)+6|  -|(-3/2)+3|= 3/2 = |(-3/2)| = |x|

Sorry about my convoluted answer and probability most likely lies with an easier method for working these out, but hey, this'll do for now ;)
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2012, 01:57:00 am »
0
@TrueTears: sorry, I forgot to add <0 to the inequality but I guess it doesn't change my question. For case 2, 'you take the intersection for obvious reasons' - that's what's not obvious to me lol

@MyLittlePony - haha, no problem. That working makes sense to me, I'll try to applying it to other problems (that was one I just made up whilst trying to understand damn absolute values, suppose I'll have to look at their graphs as well)

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2012, 02:02:15 am »
+1
because it's 'and' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersection_%28set_theory%29#Basic_definition)

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction

take note of
Quote
    x ∈ A ∩ B if and only if

        * x ∈ A and
        * x ∈ B.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2012, 02:09:12 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2012, 03:03:59 am »
0
^ Thanks

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2012, 06:23:40 pm »
0
How do you simplify this? It should evaluate to either root 3 or 0 according to my calculator (it should be plus or minus between root 3 and the big root


yawho

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Respect: +2
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2012, 07:45:51 pm »
0
How do you simplify this? It should evaluate to either root 3 or 0 according to my calculator (it should be plus or minus between root 3 and the big root


simplified to
.:

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #8 on: May 02, 2012, 07:47:39 pm »
0
How'd you simplify it to 1+root3?

yawho

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Respect: +2
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2012, 07:50:19 pm »
+1
express it as a + sqrt(b), square both sides to find a and b

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #10 on: May 02, 2012, 07:55:35 pm »
+1
sorry, you're dealing with a moron here, could you give me a bit more? you're allowed to square it?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2012, 08:11:57 pm »
+2





and


a = 1 and b = 3

or and b = 1

In either we are left with

i think that's what he means lol
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2012, 08:49:27 pm »
0
^ aah, thanks a lot! where do you guys pick these little tricks up from?

geniuses lol

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2012, 01:13:41 pm »
0
Why can't we have a negative base for logs? If the number on the bottom is negative, than can't the base be negative (for certain integers). Like log(-2)(-8) = 3

And what does it mean to differentiate with respect to a certain variable? It's coming up in implicit differentiation and it's got me confused but I'm asking here cause it's a mcnoob question

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Methods 3/4 Questions
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2012, 01:19:46 pm »
+1
Why can't we have a negative base for logs? If the number on the bottom is negative, than can't the base be negative (for certain integers). Like log(-2)(-8) = 3

And what does it mean to differentiate with respect to a certain variable? It's coming up in implicit differentiation and it's got me confused but I'm asking here cause it's a mcnoob question
Well you can have a negative base for logs, it's just that it's not defined.

Think about it, if we have some function y = a^x where a<0, ie, say y = (-2)^x

then clearly for some values of x, y will be undefined in the real space, you could at least think of 1 very obvious one, ie, when x = 1/2

Thus when we take the inverse, x = (-2)^y -> y = log_(-2)(x) this would not make a very useful or nice function, it's discontinuous, because it's inverse is discontinuous, and it's simply a plot of different points rather than smooth joining curve, there's just simply not much use defining a negative base for a log. Other than that, what you have written isn't wrong and is intuitively reasonable, it's just that it's not well-defined.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.