Did everyone else find section C strange?

[Coolgalbornin03Lo]

For the first time techniques appeals etc didn’t just jump out at me. It was crazy I think it was easily the worse language analysis I’ve written.

[petriichor]

For the first time techniques appeals etc didn’t just jump out at me. It was crazy I think it was easily the worse language analysis I’ve written.

I agree - there didn't seem to be a lot to talk about. Like it was pretty long but just... empty?

[99.95_goal]

For the first time techniques appeals etc didn’t just jump out at me. It was crazy I think it was easily the worse language analysis I’ve written.

Well just for me personally all LA are the same because the point is tracking progression and logic in the article so it didn't matter how many 'techniques' you found but rather if you can grasp the flow of the article

[Genshai]

yeah i felt the same way! i was also expecting a second article, so i wasnt prepared for only one. i found the tone hard to describe (but maybe i just need to work on my tonal words haha)

[Coolgalbornin03Lo]

Well just for me personally all LA are the same because the point is tracking progression and logic in the article so it didn't matter how many 'techniques' you found but rather if you can grasp the flow of the article

I know it’s not about techniques but it was so difficult to find appeals to sub-catagories of his audience and also what type of atmosphere he was aiming to create the article DID NOT FLOW.

[The Cat In The Hat]

As to appealing to sub-categories, I just pulled out all the times he was referring to farmers, anything to do with that, compared with whenever he was saying stuff directly to the council or whatever - was that wrong? The article's atmosphere kept changing, I felt, so I just kept on talking about his tonal shifts and how they made different feelings etc.; was that, also, wrong? I was very glad but surprised it was only one article.... I didn't feel it was 'empty' of anything to say - I had to make sure I didn't say everything I could've, which was annoying. I didn't put in enough intended effect though.  I felt it was a weird one, overall, nothing like previous years'. 

But never mind - it's over - we can forget about it!
until we get our results...

[Coolgalbornin03Lo]

As to appealing to sub-categories, I just pulled out all the times he was referring to farmers, anything to do with that, compared with whenever he was saying stuff directly to the council or whatever - was that wrong? The article's atmosphere kept changing, I felt, so I just kept on talking about his tonal shifts and how they made different feelings etc.; was that, also, wrong? I was very glad but surprised it was only one article.... I didn't feel it was 'empty' of anything to say - I had to make sure I didn't say everything I could've, which was annoying. I didn't put in enough intended effect though.  I felt it was a weird one, overall, nothing like previous years'. 

But never mind - it's over - we can forget about it!
until we get our results...

That was me! I put in intended emotion he wanted to evoke, but as for actions he wanted them to do and I know you need that for the high marks  😭
 But oh well your right! It’s overrr