Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 20, 2024, 09:45:56 am

Author Topic: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions  (Read 42006 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joseph41

  • Administrator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 10823
  • Respect: +7477
Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« on: October 09, 2018, 03:27:14 pm »
0

This thread is for all exam-related discussion. Was it easy? Was it hard? What did you get for each question? Feel free to post any and all of your thoughts below.

If you don't have an ATAR Notes account yet, no stress - you can register for free here!
« Last Edit: October 23, 2018, 02:59:05 pm by Joseph41 »

Oxford comma, Garamond, Avett Brothers, Orla Gartland enthusiast.

Seno72

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Respect: +6
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2018, 01:25:22 pm »
+2
Yeah, spring compression was prety hard, probably lost 2 marks. Also that power loss question in transformers question was pretty dodgy. Everything else was pretty good.
Biology -38 (2017)
Further Maths- 44 (2018)
Methods - 39 (2018)
Chemistry - 41 (2018)
Physics - 43 (2018)
English - 41 (2018)

KiNSKi01

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
  • Respect: +9
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2018, 01:28:30 pm »
0
Yeah totally stuffed up second and third part of spring question

Think answers should have been 0 m/s^2 and 0.05 metres


One of the tranmission questions were dodgey but I think the main thing you had to recognise is that the power was the same as it was in the first scenario
ATAR: 98.20

'18:
Physics - 42
Psychology - 40

'19:
English Language -42
Chemistry - 40
Further Maths - 45
Maths Methods - 40

Seno72

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Respect: +6
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2018, 01:35:50 pm »
0
Yeah the answer for third part was 0.05 m. So stupid mistake. You can use kx = mg.

If the power was the same it would have been pretty easy. But I would have thought the power dissipated would be different from the original scenario. What did you choose for the definition for uncertainty in the multiple choice? I said it was the doubt in the measurement (choice A)?
Biology -38 (2017)
Further Maths- 44 (2018)
Methods - 39 (2018)
Chemistry - 41 (2018)
Physics - 43 (2018)
English - 41 (2018)

KiNSKi01

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
  • Respect: +9
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2018, 01:38:28 pm »
0
Apparently since it says in the question that the globe still operates the same as it did before (lol something like that) power was the same.

Got the same answer for mcq 👍
ATAR: 98.20

'18:
Physics - 42
Psychology - 40

'19:
English Language -42
Chemistry - 40
Further Maths - 45
Maths Methods - 40

Nomi16

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2018, 01:50:55 pm »
0
Yeah totally stuffed up second and third part of spring question

Think answers should have been 0 m/s^2 and 0.05 metres


I reckon the answer for part b is 9.8 m/s^2 as that's the maximum acceleration due to gravity.
Biology (2017) - 35
Further Maths (2017) - 40
Methods (2018) - 36
Chemistry (2018) - 35
Physics (2018) - 40
English (2018) - 37

ATAR - 92.90

2019~2021 - Biomed @ UoM

jpulvirenti

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2018, 01:58:25 pm »
0
what did you get for the powerloss questions

AlphaZero

  • MOTM: DEC 18
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 352
  • \[\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1-z)=\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)}\]
  • Respect: +160
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2018, 01:59:09 pm »
+3
Same as yesterday.
We'll do our best to get the solutions out as quick as we can!
2015\(-\)2017:  VCE
2018\(-\)2021:  Bachelor of Biomedicine and Mathematical Sciences Diploma, University of Melbourne


KiNSKi01

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
  • Respect: +9
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2018, 01:59:28 pm »
+1
Yeah that’s what I had but it’s wrong

The question asked what is the acceleration when the ball had its max velocity

Once the ball comes into contact with the spring it is still acccelerating but the value for its acceleration decreases. Once the value of acceleration reaches 0 m/s^2 (when mg=kx) the ball reaches its max velocity

I’m guessing you did the same as me and assumed that as soon as the ball came into contact with the spring it would start slowing down. Unfortunately that’s not true Ahahah
ATAR: 98.20

'18:
Physics - 42
Psychology - 40

'19:
English Language -42
Chemistry - 40
Further Maths - 45
Maths Methods - 40

number6603

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2018, 02:17:17 pm »
0
I feel like, logically, it has to be 0 - if the acceleration is positive, then it hasn't hit its max velocity. If it's still accelerating, it's increasing velocity, and it can't be at maximum velocity if its velocity is still increasing.

Theodric_Ironfist

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2018, 02:24:29 pm »
0
What about part a of the spring question? Says to show that k = 392. I used to mg=kx and got k=39.2. Possible typo?

KiNSKi01

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
  • Respect: +9
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2018, 02:27:01 pm »
+1
Nah had to use energy equations

Mgh (top) = mgh (bottom +1/2kx^2 and solve for k
ATAR: 98.20

'18:
Physics - 42
Psychology - 40

'19:
English Language -42
Chemistry - 40
Further Maths - 45
Maths Methods - 40

aussiboi

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2018, 02:28:43 pm »
+1
No vcaa are never wrong :)

mg∆h = 1/2kx^2
2 x 9.8 x 2.5 = 1/2 x k x 0.5^2

rearranging it to find k gives 392 xD

Theodric_Ironfist

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: +3
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2018, 02:30:23 pm »
0
No vcaa are never wrong :)

mg∆h = 1/2kx^2
2 x 9.8 x 2.5 = 1/2 x k x 0.5^2

rearranging it to find k gives 392 xD

But it says when they come to rest. Then the forces would be balanced and mg=kx. Unless they meant "momentarily" at rest, in which case they should have specified.

aussiboi

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Respect: 0
Re: Physics: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2018, 02:31:08 pm »
0
How did we meant to draw the 3 mark graph of emf ??? idk i drew my like sin