Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 20, 2024, 08:14:56 am
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Scores  (Read 6907 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Scores
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2007, 11:16:03 am »
0
I don't actually see why people are dogpiling on him though. His statements about overestimating SS's are true! His estimates are quite good, but he just lacks tact in criticising others.
Logged

bonghead

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Respect: 0
Scores
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2007, 12:21:05 pm »
0
Quote from: "Defiler"
Forums encourage use of structured sentences and things such as: grammar, punctuation and spelling. Also, dropping the arrogant attitude and adopting a one similar to what Ahmad displays would be of benefit to you.


If you support the correct use of "punctuation" and "grammar" (I dont really care), I believe that your sentence "...and adopting a one similar to.." is incorrect and should be "...adopting one..".
Logged
ims:   Enter~95

Defiler

  • Guest
Scores
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2007, 12:42:48 pm »
0
Quote from: "bonghead"
If you support the correct use of "punctuation" and "grammar" (I dont really care), I believe that your sentence "...and adopting a one similar to.." is incorrect and should be "...adopting one..".


You are correct, a mistake on my part. However, such a mistake highly beats out something akin to:
Quote
iwas crazi @ metho
. Also, at the end of your quote "...adopting one..". The ellipsis should be fully used, followed by " and then a further full stop, or leave the last full stop out completely, or do not use a second ellipsis and simply close the quotation marks and end with a full stop.
Logged

kido_1

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Respect: +6
Scores
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2007, 12:53:01 pm »
0
Who cares about punctuation?

As long as you get what we are trying to communicate.

Btw, I was crazi at metho should be: I am crazy at metho.
Logged
oping for an ENTER of 99+

bonghead

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Respect: 0
Scores
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2007, 01:08:11 pm »
0
Quote from: "Defiler"
Quote from: "bonghead"
If you support the correct use of "punctuation" and "grammar" (I dont really care), I believe that your sentence "...and adopting a one similar to.." is incorrect and should be "...adopting one..".


You are correct, a mistake on my part. However, such a mistake highly beats out something akin to:
Quote
iwas crazi @ metho
. Also, at the end of your quote "...adopting one..". The ellipsis should be fully used, followed by " and then a further full stop, or leave the last full stop out completely, or do not use a second ellipsis and simply close the quotation marks and end with a full stop.


haha i was just trying to be a smart arse (I cant help it) so theres no need to pick on my insignificant use of trivial ellipsis.
Logged
ims:   Enter~95

kido_1

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Respect: +6
Scores
« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2007, 01:09:56 pm »
0
Quote from: "bonghead"
Quote from: "Defiler"
Quote from: "bonghead"
If you support the correct use of "punctuation" and "grammar" (I dont really care), I believe that your sentence "...and adopting a one similar to.." is incorrect and should be "...adopting one..".


You are correct, a mistake on my part. However, such a mistake highly beats out something akin to:
Quote
iwas crazi @ metho
. Also, at the end of your quote "...adopting one..". The ellipsis should be fully used, followed by " and then a further full stop, or leave the last full stop out completely, or do not use a second ellipsis and simply close the quotation marks and end with a full stop.


haha i was just trying to be a smart arse (I cant help it) so theres no need to pick on my insignificant use of trivial ellipses.


lol

Imagine we get marked on methods for our punctuation as well as our maths. :P
Logged
oping for an ENTER of 99+

kingmar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 351
  • Non Sequitur
  • Respect: +2
Scores
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2007, 02:12:13 pm »
0
Well, at least he escaped a rustic_metal pile-on.

We are all civilised people, yes? That first post was uncivilised, and completely self-defeating in purpose. His predictions weren't bad - it was the accusations and the way he went about it that was disconcerting.
Logged
ENTER: Incomprehensibly high



bonghead

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Respect: 0
Scores
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2007, 03:15:14 pm »
0
This may be a tad off topic but it is neccessary. I couldn't help but notice Kingmar's portion of his signature stating "kingmar > Tasmania Jones - lifelong ENEMY" I am in a complete state of shock over the manner at which tasmania jones has been treated. Im pretty sure Tasmania Jones> life and should be given legendary status. How can anyone discredit Tasmania Jones?
Logged
ims:   Enter~95

kingmar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 351
  • Non Sequitur
  • Respect: +2
Scores
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2007, 07:19:22 pm »
0
Quote from: "bonghead"
This may be a tad off topic but it is neccessary. I couldn't help but notice Kingmar's portion of his signature stating "kingmar > Tasmania Jones - lifelong ENEMY" I am in a complete state of shock over the manner at which tasmania jones has been treated. Im pretty sure Tasmania Jones> life and should be given legendary status. How can anyone discredit Tasmania Jones?


Tasmania Jones whipped my methodical arse in that exam. I will not have a bar of it.

This could have been taken care of via PM. But no, public domain requires a signature edit, appropriate until I finally lose interest in Tasmania Jones' horror run.
Logged
ENTER: Incomprehensibly high



kido_1

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Respect: +6
Scores
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2007, 07:23:42 pm »
0
Tasmania Jones was a source of a silly mistake.

This silly mistakes will prove deadly and will help reduce my Methods SS.

Therefor I hate Tasmania Jones(he/she).
Logged
oping for an ENTER of 99+

golids

  • Guest
Scores
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2007, 08:20:43 pm »
0
Tasmania treated me alright this time i thought lol. He/she completely fucked me in a couple of his/her previous activities  :lol:
Logged

kido_1

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Respect: +6
Scores
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2007, 08:57:18 pm »
0
There was a prob question in the 2003/04 VCAA test that was pretty annoying with Tassy Jones in it.
Logged
oping for an ENTER of 99+

bonghead

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Respect: 0
Scores
« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2007, 09:03:28 pm »
0
Quote from: "kido_1"
Tasmania Jones was a source of a silly mistake.

This silly mistakes will prove deadly and will help reduce my Methods SS.

Therefor I hate Tasmania Jones(he/she).


lol haha you put m=0 didnt you? Thats what i did anyway and that mistake will also serve as a terminal illness to my methods SS. Nevertheless, please, people, show a bit of respect for Tasmania Jones. The man (or woman im confused now-maybe both?) :?  is just such a multiskilled motovational genius (he went through deadly insects to get to a diamond). Come on, who else would risk their lives for a diamond. He has done so much for us all.
Logged
ims:   Enter~95

kido_1

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Respect: +6
Scores
« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2007, 09:06:29 pm »
0
Quote from: "bonghead"
Quote from: "kido_1"
Tasmania Jones was a source of a silly mistake.

This silly mistakes will prove deadly and will help reduce my Methods SS.

Therefor I hate Tasmania Jones(he/she).


lol haha you put m=0 didnt you? Thats what i did anyway and that mistake will also serve as a terminal illness to my methods SS. Nevertheless, please, people, show a bit of respect for Tasmania Jones. The man (or woman im confused now-maybe both?) :?  is just such a multiskilled motovational genius (he went through deadly insects to get to a diamond). Come on, who else would risk their lives for a diamond. He has done so much for us all.


No, I put m=8000. However I lost a mark in the last question. I put under stressful exam conditions. Time taken= 8hrs-79.9mins NOT 80-79.9 minutes. I hope I still get 2/3 marks.

*Hope*
Logged
oping for an ENTER of 99+

kingmar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 351
  • Non Sequitur
  • Respect: +2
Scores
« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2007, 09:15:51 pm »
0
Tasmania is a MAN. He's never been a woman, who spread that?

In the Board of Studies paper 2000, another "Jones" is mentioned.

Her name is Victoria Jones. Not Tasmania. Tasmania is a man.

Even such a tricky character like Tasmania does not deserve that.

It's not that I got the Tasmania question wrong, its just that I spent 10 minutes trying to graph the bloody equation.
Logged
ENTER: Incomprehensibly high



Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up