Hey,
As I was looking for questions for module B, I ran into this one:
How has considering other interpretations of the prescribed speeches helped you develop your own appreciation of the textual integrity of the speeches?
And I was wondering how to structure your paragraphs around it? Is there like a recommended structure for this one, with one paragraph showing the more accepted view on speeches and the other paragraphs being about how different interpretations develop your insight of textual integrity?
Thank you so much!
Hey! Welcome to the forums
That's a brutal question that one. I'd probably do three speeches, one per paragraph. I think basically what each paragraph should do is take evidence from the speech and analyse it, in terms of the technique used and the response it gets from audiences, plural. So, focus on how the audience on the day would respond, how the audience of the context would respond, and how these (for example) compare with our response now (your response, because you define our response the way you choose). Then maybe a conclusion to bring it all together, saying that your view has been informed and strengthened by the other views you've discussed.
That's my thoughts at least, would love to hear others
(Sorry to the others who asked a question, didn't study either of those texts
)