All right, so initially with classical conditioning, I thought that the NS was associated with the UCS to become the CS. However, after reading about Garcia and Koelling's rat study in the Oxford text book, I have become confused.
In that section of the Oxford book, it says that "the condition 1 rats who had received the painful electric shock each time they drank the sweet water during the conditioning phase had associated the pain with the flashing light and clicking noise". The pain (UCR) is in response to the electric shock (UCS). So according to this sentence, the NS (flashing light and clicking noise) was associated with the UCR (pain due to electric shock).
I then decided to flick through Grivas to see what it said, and I found this: "...classical conditioning provides a useful explanation for learned behaviour in which an originally neutral stimulus becomes associated with a reflexive or involuntary response..." <--- that is opposite to what Oxford has written: "an association is made between the neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus".
Help would be appreciated. Thanks