Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 29, 2024, 08:22:24 am

Author Topic: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?  (Read 3621 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2010, 02:56:20 pm »
0
Would grouping objects with common features (the circles) to form a meaningful whole be considered correct? arghhhh

kazzacae

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #16 on: June 09, 2010, 02:57:41 pm »
0
in terms of your definition of similarity?
2010: English, French, Methods, Psychology, Further
2011: Commerce @ UOM

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #17 on: June 09, 2010, 02:58:23 pm »
0
^^ yeah

kazzacae

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2010, 03:06:24 pm »
0
It depends on how hard they are marking this year. i would say YES. Mind you this is what i hate about Psych and VCAA, there is no definitive answer, all these definitions and you change one word and it's wrong yet means the same thing. I said
similarity refers to the tendency to perceive stimuli of similar colour, shape, size or form as forming a group or an overall meaningful whole
2010: English, French, Methods, Psychology, Further
2011: Commerce @ UOM

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #19 on: June 09, 2010, 03:10:39 pm »
0
Yeahhh well hopefully....

Chromeo33

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #20 on: June 09, 2010, 05:44:12 pm »
0
Man that was soooooo bad
Short answer was horrible though MC was manageable..

yien_quek

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: 0
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #21 on: June 09, 2010, 05:47:59 pm »
0
what did you guys put for the Ames room question? i thought part a and b were asking the same thing! tbh, my answers were pretty similar, but i included the retinal stuff for part a, and limitation to monocular depth cues for part b.

what about AoS 3 SA? which participant characteristic did you guys choose for the matching up?

hawks08

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #22 on: June 09, 2010, 07:36:38 pm »
0
i chose coordination

minilunchbox

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #23 on: June 09, 2010, 07:39:38 pm »
0
Hand-eye coordination
...
and then right near the end of the exam I scribble in ability next to it.
2011-13: Bachelor of Science (Pharmacology) @ University of Melbourne

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #24 on: June 09, 2010, 08:30:22 pm »
0
I wonder if my "matching gender" was enough? :/ It cant be 'wrong'.

minilunchbox

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2010, 08:34:32 pm »
0
I wonder if my "matching gender" was enough? :/ It cant be 'wrong'.

lmao. Let's hope your explanation was amazing.
2011-13: Bachelor of Science (Pharmacology) @ University of Melbourne

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #26 on: June 09, 2010, 08:48:01 pm »
0
I wonder if my "matching gender" was enough? :/ It cant be 'wrong'.

lmao. Let's hope your explanation was amazing.

It really wasnt.

I said that the he was conducting a study on a male population so participants had to be matched with another male.

It makes sense right? I know thats a 'no shit' response but the study has no credibility/integrity if they dont follow what I said.

coolhat

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 86
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #27 on: June 09, 2010, 11:42:30 pm »
0
what did you guys put for the Ames room question? i thought part a and b were asking the same thing! tbh, my answers were pretty similar, but i included the retinal stuff for part a, and limitation to monocular depth cues for part b.

what about AoS 3 SA? which participant characteristic did you guys choose for the matching up?

i wasnt sure if monocular depth cues were eliminated-because when u r filming-and then projecting on a TV, you would use both eyes to see the TV.

hawks08

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Respect: +1
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #28 on: June 10, 2010, 12:02:15 am »
0
i wasnt sure if monocular depth cues were eliminated-because when u r filming-and then projecting on a TV, you would use both eyes to see the TV.
dont know why it was included. No one knows what the answer is because it wasnt on the study design

Tashi

  • Guest
Re: 2010 MID-YEAR EXAM - HOW DID YOU GO?
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2010, 12:57:33 am »
0
Well it kind of comes under Ames room in the study design... but I was just so confused as what the examiners are expecting as an answer for that question.