If I were to author a book entitled "The Philosophy of Acing a Methods Exam", tell me if you'd buy what I describe below.
The front of the book is 8 blank topic tests. 2 topic tests each will be on the areas of study in methods. Functions and Relations, Differentiation, Anti-Differentiation, Probability. These topic tests will be in the form of exam 1s and exam 2s. So for Funcs and Rels there would be an exam 1 entirely devoted to functions and relations, and an exam 2 entirely devoted to functions and relations and rinse and repeat for all the other topics. So you could feasibly work on this book the entire year and it'd be a nice taster for what's coming at the end of the year. Then there would be 3 full sets of trial exams (3 exam 1's, 3 exam 2's) at the end.
After those blank tests, would be a massive solution set. I'm not talking the piddly skeleton solutions you see elsewhere. Download my spec solutions for exam 1, 2010 and that's what I'm talking about. I would split each solutions page into 2 columns. One column would be 2/3 of the page, the other 1/3 of the page. The 1/3 column would contain MODEL solutions. That is, what you'd write to gain full marks in an exam and what your entire answer should look like. The 2/3 column would be a commentary explaining, painstakingly, every step of the solution. INCLUDING: How I would approach the question, explaining where VCAA likes to trip up students, common student mistakes, I'd sketch graphs to demonstrate things etc. just stuff you wouldn't need to include in the question solution but would thoroughly explain, beyond a shadow of a doubt, how to COMPLETELY understand the question.
Essentially, the 'philosophy' of approaching exam questions in Methods, and enhancing your mathematical problem solving skills by demonstration and explanation.
Tell me honestly if you would buy this because I'm really thinking of writing this!
If I get that done and it's successful for Methods I'll also get a Spec one done.