Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 18, 2024, 07:41:36 pm

Author Topic: 3U Maths Question Thread  (Read 1235444 times)  Share 

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

fun_jirachi

  • MOTM: AUG 18
  • Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1068
  • All doom and Gloom.
  • Respect: +710
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3810 on: November 05, 2018, 08:39:17 pm »
+4
Differentiating gets you

So you have turning points at x= plus or minus root 2.

Also note that x cannot equal zero. Therefore there is an asymptote at x=0. Also look at the limiting behaviour as x approaches 0 from both sides, and plus or minus infinity. As x approaches zero from the positive side it approaches infinity, from the negative its negative infinity, and approaches the line y=x from positive or negative infinity since the 2 will be basically inconsequential when working with large numbers. Also, you can use a sign table or whatever, but the limits should tell you what side of y=x the function is approaching.

You should get a v between x=0 and y=x when x>0, and an upside down v between x=0 and y=x when x<0, Turning points and local max at x=-sqrt2 and local min at x=sqrt2

Hope this helps :)
Spoiler
HSC 2018: Mod Hist [88] | 2U Maths [98]
HSC 2019: Physics [92] | Chemistry [93] | English Adv [87] | 3U Maths [98] | 4U Maths [97]
ATAR: 99.05

UCAT: 3310 - VR [740] | DM [890] | QR [880] | AR [800]
Guide Links:
Subject Acceleration (2018)
UCAT Question Compilation/FAQ (2020)
Asking good questions

iktimal

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3811 on: November 05, 2018, 09:05:23 pm »
0
Differentiating gets you

So you have turning points at x= plus or minus root 2.

Also note that x cannot equal zero. Therefore there is an asymptote at x=0. Also look at the limiting behaviour as x approaches 0 from both sides, and plus or minus infinity. As x approaches zero from the positive side it approaches infinity, from the negative its negative infinity, and approaches the line y=x from positive or negative infinity since the 2 will be basically inconsequential when working with large numbers. Also, you can use a sign table or whatever, but the limits should tell you what side of y=x the function is approaching.

You should get a v between x=0 and y=x when x>0, and an upside down v between x=0 and y=x when x<0, Turning points and local max at x=-sqrt2 and local min at x=sqrt2

Hope this helps :)

Oh ok, thank you.

mirakhiralla

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3812 on: December 02, 2018, 01:31:47 pm »
0
can someone please help me with this inequality induction?
I never know what to do with inequalities:

(4^n) - 1 - 7n >0

thank you

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3813 on: December 02, 2018, 02:03:23 pm »
+1
can someone please help me with this inequality induction?
I never know what to do with inequalities:

(4^n) - 1 - 7n >0

thank you
I'm assuming the base case is \(n = 2\), since \(n=1\) does not work :)

When you're trying to prove inequalities, try finding smaller or bigger things to substitute to keep the inequality true! You should always remember what you're trying to prove and justify every step you make (especially if your substitution seems out of the blue!). For example, if you're trying to prove that \(a > b\), then try finding something larger than \(a\) so that the inequality remains true.

You may also rearrange the assumption if you find that it's better when you're trying to use the inductive hypothesis! :)
We'll assume that the statement holds for \(n=k\), so:
\[  4^k - 1 - 7k > 0 \Rightarrow 4^k > 1 + 7k\]

And so:
\[\begin{align*}
4^{k+1} - 1 - 7(k+1) &= 4\cdot 4^k - 1 - 7(k + 1) \\ &> 4(1 + 7k) - 1 - 7(k+1) \\ &= 4 + 4\cdot 7k - 1 - 7k - 7 \\ &= -4 + 3\cdot 7k \\ &> 3\times 7 - 4 \tag{k > 1} \\ &> 0
\end{align*}\]
« Last Edit: December 03, 2018, 02:17:25 pm by Opengangs »

Livjane_2203

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3814 on: December 03, 2018, 11:39:41 am »
0
Hey would someone be able to help with this induction question I just haven't done a problem which has two gaps in the series:

prove the following true for all positive integers n.

1+ (2+3) + ... + {n+ (n+1) + ... + (2n-1)} = n^2/2 (n+1)

Thanks much appreciated.

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3815 on: December 03, 2018, 12:54:35 pm »
+3
Hey would someone be able to help with this induction question I just haven't done a problem which has two gaps in the series:

prove the following true for all positive integers n.

1+ (2+3) + ... + {n+ (n+1) + ... + (2n-1)} = n^2/2 (n+1)

Thanks much appreciated.
When \(n = 1\), the left side is just 1. The right side becomes:
\[ \frac{1^2(1+1)}{2} = 1.\]

When \(n = k\), we assume the following is true:
\[ 1 + (2+3) + \dots + (k + (k+1) + \dots + (2k - 1)) = \frac{k^2(k+1)}{2}\]

Now, we want to prove the following:
\[ 1 + (2+3) + \dots + (k + (k+1) + \dots + (2k - 1)) + ((k+1) + (k+2) + \dots + 2(k+1) - 1) = \frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)}{2}\]

We begin with a substitution of our inductive hypothesis.
\[ \begin{align*}1 + (2+3) + \dots + (k + (k+1) + \dots + &(2k - 1)) + ((k+1) + (k+2) + \dots + 2(k+1) - 1) \\ &= \frac{k^2(k+1)}{2} + ((k+1) + (k+2) + \dots + 2(k+1) - 1) \tag{by our inductive hypothesis} \\ &= \frac{k^2(k+1)}{2} + \underbrace{((k+1) + (k+2) + \dots + 2(k+1) - 1)}_{\text{AP series}}\end{align*}\]

We have an AP series with first term \((k+1)\) and \(k+1\) terms, so using our AP formula, we get:
\[ ((k+1) + (k+2) + \dots + 2(k+1) - 1) = \frac{k+1}{2}\left((k+1) + 2k + 1\right)\]

Substituting that into our equation gives us:
\[ \begin{align*}\frac{k^2(k+1)}{2} +((k+1) + (k+2) + \dots + 2(k+1) - 1) &= \frac{k^2(k+1)}{2} + \frac{k+1}{2}\left((k+1) + 2k + 1\right) \\ &= \frac{k+1}{2}\left(k^2 + (k + 1) + (2k + 1)\right) \\ &= \frac{k+1}{2}\left((k+1)(k+2)\right)\end{align*}\]
as required.

emiq

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3816 on: December 07, 2018, 06:22:14 pm »
0
The speed of a projectile when it is at its maximum height is "the root of 7/6" of its speed when it is half of its maximum height, find the launch angle

AlphaZero

  • MOTM: DEC 18
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 352
  • \[\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1-z)=\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)}\]
  • Respect: +160
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3817 on: December 07, 2018, 07:20:06 pm »
+3
The speed of a projectile when it is at its maximum height is "the root of 7/6" of its speed when it is half of its maximum height, find the launch angle

The question is actually worded incorrectly. It should read: "The speed of a projectile when it is at half its maximum height is \(\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}}\) of its speed when it is at maximum height. Find the launch angle."

First, let's define a few things. The projectile will be fired at an angle of \(\theta\) to the horizontal, where \(0\leq\theta\leq\dfrac{\pi}{2}\) and at a speed of \(u\ \text{ms}^{-1}\), where \(u>0\).


In the vertical direction, using \(v=v_0+at\), time to max height is given by \[0=u\sin(\theta)-gT_1\ \Longrightarrow\ T_1=\frac{u\sin(\theta)}{g}.\]
In the vertical direction, using \(s=v_0t+\dfrac{1}{2}at^2\), the max height is given by
Therefore, in the vertical direction using \(v^2=v_0^2+2as\), the vertical component of the velocity at half max height is given by
The horizontal component of the projectile's velocity is a constant \(u\cos(\theta)\ \text{ms}^{-1}\), so we have \[\sqrt{\frac{7}{6}}\cdot u\cos(\theta)=\sqrt{\left(u\cos(\theta)\right)^2+\left(\frac{u\sin(\theta)}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2}\ \Longrightarrow\ \cos^2(\theta)=\frac{3}{4}\]
Hence, the launch angle is  \(\theta=\dfrac{\pi}{6}=30^\circ\).
« Last Edit: December 07, 2018, 08:09:53 pm by dantraicos »
2015\(-\)2017:  VCE
2018\(-\)2021:  Bachelor of Biomedicine and Mathematical Sciences Diploma, University of Melbourne


emiq

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3818 on: December 07, 2018, 07:32:46 pm »
0
Just to clarify, when you say "the root of 7/6", do you mean \(\sqrt{\dfrac{7}{6}}\) or \(\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{6}\)?

Only reason I ask is I believe there is no solution using \(\sqrt{\dfrac{7}{6}}\).

The answer is 30 degrees. I just don't know the process.

chayek

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3819 on: December 11, 2018, 09:31:01 pm »
0
Hi, i have a question regarding finding the greatest coefficient
The question is to find the greatest coefficient of (2x^2 - 3/x)^11
My answer is -11547360
Am i supposed to be getting a negative value for the greatest coefficient?

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3820 on: December 11, 2018, 09:38:48 pm »
0
Hi, i have a question regarding finding the greatest coefficient
The question is to find the greatest coefficient of (2x^2 - 3/x)^11
My answer is -11547360
Am i supposed to be getting a negative value for the greatest coefficient?

Yeah, this was the weird one; I'd assume they just take magnitude of the coefficient, which in this case would be just 11, 547, 360. What does the answer say?

chayek

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3821 on: December 11, 2018, 09:41:50 pm »
0
Yeah, this was the weird one; I'd assume they just take magnitude of the coefficient, which in this case would be just 11, 547, 360. What does the answer say?

the answer was also a negative, I'm just a bit confused whether to put a negative in an exam or not

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3822 on: December 11, 2018, 09:43:01 pm »
0
the answer was also a negative, I'm just a bit confused whether to put a negative in an exam or not
In the exam they won't be so disambiguous. They will explain if they want the one with the greatest magnitude, or the one that's actually the greatest when you incorporate the sign.

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3823 on: December 11, 2018, 09:44:35 pm »
0
the answer was also a negative, I'm just a bit confused whether to put a negative in an exam or not
Normally, you would omit the "negative" as we really only want the magnitude of the coefficient. But since your assessments/exams are marked by your teachers, your best bet would be to ask the teacher what they would accept. Alternatively, you could leave it negative but make a disclaimer saying something like "Then the magnitude of the coefficient is ... ".

Hopefully, that helps with your question! :)

david.wang28

  • MOTM: MAR 19
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
  • Always do everything equanimously
  • Respect: +29
Re: 3U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #3824 on: December 24, 2018, 03:35:44 pm »
0
Hello,
I have trouble with question 1 b) and 1 i). Can I get a detailed answer please? Thank you!
Selection rank: 95.25

2020-2024: Bachelor of engineering and computer science @ UNSW