hrmm Access Education have a really great page on this where they outline every way that examiners can ask a q and say how to answer it. However i do not have a scanner.
I must disagree with the Killerkob in one part where he used the exam of one ADR. You should NEVER be adament about something, don't leave it blank. Don't say it's more effective than this or this ain't as effective. Be more subtle. First talk about strengths and weaknesses. Than in the conclusion says something like this:
"While ADR's provide a means of providing for better operation of the legal system through it's time efficient methods of resolving disputes, cheap access and often alternative means from going to intimidating and lengthy court proceedings. Nonetheless, it is often not as effective due to the fact that it is not always binding, it may leave present disputes temporarily annealed but may arise in the future, it is not always cheap due to the fact that legal representation is sometimes advisable and it may not be fair due to the fact that one party may hire legal rep while the other can't."