I might have a slightly different interpretation of this, initally I went to use implicit differentiation too, then realised that they probably haven't come across it yet. But the way its worded, it
may be asking for the values that m can be, which you can get from the second method, graph it and you can see that the gradient can be
. To get this via another method, if you graph the original function, we can see it has asymptotes of
and
. And when we look at the graph, looking at the right arm, the gradient is going to always be greater than 2 when it approaches
and always going to be less than (well more negative) than
. For the left arm the gradient on the top part of the curve is under the asymptote and moving away from it, so that the gradient is always less than (more negative) than -2 and for the bottom half, always going to be greater than 2 (for the
asymtptote). SO that is
.
Anyways, thats just another way of looking at it, less mathematical though, but might help you understand it a little bit more.