I think sexism is experienced by both genders, and in some cases more so towards men (I'm a girl). I think as a society we have become so fixated on women empowerment, violence against women, and problems concerning women that we sometimes forget about men entirely. Sexist things that men face include people assuming that men don't cry, that men don't experience domestic violence, that men are somehow 'above' women and so should be 'brought down'.
I also think people misuse the term feminism as a way to disparage men, instead of using it as a means to create gender equality, for both men and women. Also, call me nitpicking, but the term feminism is slightly sexist in its own way - I honestly believe it should be 'humanism' or 'equalism' or something like that.
Seriously men experience so much sexism nowadays, just like women. Has anyone seen BuzzFeed's video, '36 Questions Women Have For Men'? Perfect examples right there.
I do, however, think that individual men are damaged by patriarchal structures and assumptions, too. For example, the expectation that they demonstrate a stereotyped form of 'strength' in all situations, discouraging them from demonstrating love, compassion, a sense of equality with others (especially women, gay men, etc), commitment to family, and so on.
ACE, thanks for your valuable contribution to the discussion. I agree with some 'essence' of your post but perhaps disagree with the idea that men are experience 'sexism' - for the reasons already outlined by Meganrobyn in the spoiler below. This takes a more sophisticated definition of sexism than most people are wont to use, with many preferring to just use "sexism" as some sort of loose paraphrase for "difference of treatment between the genders"... but I think the latter definition becomes problematic (perhaps a discussion for another time).
Spoiler
Sexism as a social phenomena isn't actually something that is a 'men' issue, because the idea is that a dominant group (sex, race, etc) exercises power over a subordinate group on the basis of that specific characteristic. In a society based on a patriarchal hierarchy, individual men can certainly and absolutely feel poorly treated because of their sex, but sexism against men isn't a 'thing' per se as a social/structural phenomenon.
But it's absolutely right to say that men are impact by gender (and absolutely wrong to say that the broader feminist movement is bad for men), so in terms of 'forgetting about men entirely', I don't think it's possible. For one, society is structured in a way that it's literally impossible to forget about men (take a look at our House of Representatives), and secondly, feminism is a battle against oppressive and wrong social/historical ideas about gender - inclusive of gender norms, gender perceptions, whatever you want. So if men are being negatively impacted by gender norms and feminism fights gender norms, then feminism is doing a good thing for men.
Humanism/equalism are just inappropriate words because they don't - in any way, shape, or form - do anything meaningful other than escape 'fem'. I understand that people are intimidated by adopting the label of feminist, particularly given the backlash potentially received and the association then made with people whose views we might not agree with, but the word feminist is 'feminist' and not 'equalist' for a reason, and that's because if you want to be an equalist then you have to focus on the groups that have been fucking stepped on by socially powerful groups for millennia. I have friends that say they're an equalist - because God, the word sounds nice, doesn't it - but what does it say? "I want equality". That's awesome. What it doesn't say is "I recognise that there are gross inequalities".
So yeah, feminism has a (pretty fucking obvious) distinct focus and historical tradition rooting for the better treatment of women that's imbued within the definition and sound of the word. But to pass over the use of that word to find something that includes men (like equalism) not only doesn't achieve any target other than making your position un-attackable (who wants to attack equality?!). It describes no position, and doesn't help either men or women.
I hate gendered society both because it impacts negatively on people - overwhelmingly women - but also because it's impacted on me, and undoubtedly a lot of other males on this forum. As a meek mannered and academically focussed child who liked to read books in class, we can all imagine the amount of times I was called a faggot, a girl, a pussy, or any other more vicious terms, as well as facing general social exclusion, taunting and whatever else. And yeah, of course, I've been through the whole "must not cry, must not talk about emotions", "must win", "must be tough" and whatever other male experiences you want to talk about (most of which were horrifyingly present even in under 11s Aussie Rules football teams). But the fact of the matter is that if it wasn't bad for be a girl, these 'feminine' traits couldn't be used as an insult. If there weren't a broader, underlying societal attack on femaleness - well, little boys wouldn't be bothered by being associated with femaleness, would they! If gender terms were neutral and someone called you a call, it'd be like getting called an adult or something. "You're an adult!" Ok. Cool. Thanks for the weird insult. This is a "surface" example just dealing with name calling and whatever else, but for so many distinctly male societal issues, you can trace a line straight back to the broader issues we have in society with gender (which are overwhelmingly attached to women).
Basically, the essence of what I'm saying in this post is that feminism is good for men.
Put sloppily.
1. Men are impacted by gender in society.
2. Feminism aims to combat the impact of gender in society.
Conclusion: Men benefit from successful feminism.
I'm not saying that feminism is super great because it's good for men. Primarily, it's super great because it's good for women (and even more great because it's good for men - it's a win-win, hooray!) But I am saying that any undermining of feminism or the broader feminist movement/history on the basis that 'men face inequality too' or 'feminism is bad because it only focusses on women' is not only besides the point, but also just wrong. Feminism is good for everyone.
Also hip-hip hooray that we've gone onto the second page of a gender-based discussion without anyone being insufferably rude.