Hey Guys! I'm really confused about Mod A - Distinctive Images
So the rubric states :
"In their responding and composing, student's explore the ways we see the images and/or visualise in texts are created... consider how the forms, features and language ... create these images, affect interpretation and shape meaning"
So basically it saying that this module is looking into how we as an audience/responder percieve images or imagine them through written, spoken or visual text.
If I were correct, then to answer this question, "How are distinctive images used to convey ideas in the related text of your choosing?"
I would discuss how certain visuals tehcniques convey ideas (doing an artwork)?
Would I need to state what I visualise from seeing certain visual features of the image?
For example, melting clock ... one could visualise the absecence of time/clock in their home??? haha I'm so clueless
Hey Dalvin! I'm not 100% sure of the answer to this but I've scrolled the internet to get a bit of an idea...
The module wants you to analyse the way texts are constructed, how this affects the way people interpret the texts, and how this all helps to create meaning in a text. You need to explain how the features of the visual text (colour, text, size, mise-en-scene, etc) come together to
shape a meaning, and
evoke a response. So with your example of the clock, if there is a melting clock, I'd interpret the melting (potentially added to by colour, shape, texture, etc), to be shaping the meaning of something becoming destroyed, withering away before our eyes, etc. And mix that with the symbol of the clock representing time (the structure of society) we might be able to view it all as a shaped meaning of life decaying before us.
This is hard to explain without having the actual text to look at, so I'm just hoping we are visualising the same thing! But it appears the module is simple: Texts are created through very strategic techniques ----- this shapes different meanings ----- and we interpret these meanings differently because art is open to interpretation, afterall.
Hopefully this gives you an idea, please ping back if it's still a bit lost on you and then we can look at being more specific