Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 20, 2024, 09:26:29 am

Author Topic: QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study  (Read 3363 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tierney_P

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: +2
QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study
« on: October 20, 2020, 11:32:52 am »
0
Hey all peoples ;D ;D

Going about answering this question:
Assess the extent to which Soviet foreign policy achieved its aims in the period 1917-1941.

I was thinking along the lines of "to a partial extent" but also saying that the aims themselves changed throughout that period? As in like at the beginning they were all about 'permanent revolution' but then they decided that defence was the best option...
Is that just a really bad idea or what? Really struggle with foreign policy so I might just dodge that question in the exam ::) ;)
« Last Edit: October 20, 2020, 11:34:41 am by Tierney_P »
bring on 2nd november 🤩

Tierney_P

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: +2
Re: QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2020, 12:19:20 pm »
0
EDIT: Here's the essay I just wrote, please anybody I need feedback!
(I don't want to send it to my teacher because its so bad :P)

To what extent did Soviet foreign policy achieve its aims in the period 1917-1941?

   Soviet foreign policy was, for the most part, unsuccessful in achieving its aims during this period; however, the aims themselves were subject to change as a result of the surrounding circumstances. During the early years – 1917 to 1922 – the Communist theory of “permanent revolution” permeated foreign policy. From 1924 to the 1930s, the USSR’s leaders realised more that tensions were heating up and attempted to normalise relations with the West; and between 1937 and 1941, foreign policy was aimed at surviving the impending Second World War.
   The October Revolution of 1917 occurred at a tumultuous time in world history, and the early leaders of the USSR saw this as a prime opportunity for a Communist revolution to sweep the globe. In 1918, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed between the Germans and the new Soviet government. Vladimir Lenin’s right-hand man, Leon Trotsky, advocated for a stance towards this of “neither peace nor war”; this is often regarded as idiocy by historians, however in the circumstances, a Communist revolution in Germany was, in the Soviets’ view, approaching. This would have enabled the spread of “permanent revolution” throughout Europe and saved the Soviets from conceding the harsh conditions of the treaty, through which the Soviets lost a significant amount of land, including 1/3 of the land used for agricultural production. However, the revolution in Germany never occurred, and thus the Soviets failed to accomplish their aim of “permanent revolution” in 1918. In 1919, Soviet forces attempted to fulfil this aim in the invasion of Poland, marking the beginning of the Russo-Polish War. The war was intended to spark the “inevitable” worldwide revolution, however after more than 12 months of fighting the Poles defeated the Soviets, ending with the signing of the Treaty of Riga in March 1921. This defeat was a strong blow to Soviet foreign policy, effectively signaling the end of the fight for “permanent revolution”.
   After Lenin’s death in 1924 and the ensuing power struggle between prominent Bolsheviks, Josef Stalin was recognised as the supreme leader of the USSR; and with him came his policy of “socialism in one country”. This marked the first change in the aims of Soviet foreign policy in the period 1917-1941, and the beginning of many attempts to normalise relations with the West; despite feeling like an “outcast” on the world stage, as a communist nation surrounded by capitalist ones. Treaties were signed with Persia and Afghanistan, among others, and a trade agreement titled the “Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement” initiated trade between the United Kingdom and the USSR. However, Anglo-Soviet relations ground to a halt in 1926, when a letter purported to be from Grigory Zinoviev to the British government was published in a British newspaper – in the letter, “Zinoviev” prompted the government to revolt against the British monarchy. Anti-communist feeling within Britain then led to the British Labour government losing the 1926 election in a historical defeat, and despite attempts by the Soviets, relations never picked up again. This shows that despite the USSR’s best attempts to gain status among Western nations, their reputation as a communist country in a capitalist world limited their effectiveness, displaying that the aims of Soviet foreign policy were not achieved during this period.
   From the mid-1930s, tensions in Europe began to increase, and in response, the USSR’s foreign office changed its aims for the second time; this time to avoiding war at all costs. In 1931, when the Japanese invaded Manchuria, the Soviets displayed this aim through the adoption of a policy of appeasement; not interfering with the Japanese for fear of war. This showed that the USSR was partially successful in achieving this aim of no war, however this was only one singular incident. In September 1938, the “Munich Crisis” occurred, where British and French leaders met with Hitler and conceded Czechoslovakia to the Nazis. The Soviets, allied with the British and French, were furious that they were not included in the negotiations, and relations with Western powers became strained. This, coupled with the rise of Hitler throughout the next year – 1939, led to the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact in August 1939, in a last-ditch effort to save the USSR from certain defeat at the hands of the superior Germans. While this appears to fulfil the Soviet foreign policy aim of avoiding war, the Nazis invaded the USSR as part of “Operation Barbarossa” in 1940, showing that Soviet foreign policy was again unsuccessful in achieving its aim.
   Soviet foreign policy was unsuccessful in achieving its aims from 1917-1941, however the aims themselves changed twice during this time, to cope with circumstances at the time. Early foreign policy under Lenin emphasised the aim of worldwide revolution, while 1920s-30s foreign policy involved the instigation of somewhat normal relations with world powers. Finally, in the years leading up the Second World War, foreign policy was aimed at preventing another defeat like WW1, which had destroyed the USSR only 20 years earlier.
bring on 2nd november 🤩

The Cat In The Hat

  • MOTM: NOV 20
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 991
  • Do all to the glory of God. - 1 Corinthians 10:31
  • Respect: +344
Re: QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2020, 02:05:04 pm »
+2
Note I'm a VCE student, so I don't know your stuff/expectations etc., but looking at it from a History: Revolutions perspective (I'm doing Russia, so I know a chunk of the stuff) I see a few things:
-Do you need more historians' perspectives? For instance, the end of the first body paragraph, I know there's a historian quote that effectively says that last sentence, which you could reference.
-It's a 'to what extent' question, so what my teacher says to do is start the first sentence with a nice broad thing e.g. 'To a large extent' then the rest of your sentence.
-I think your structure is good. :)
-You have some good specifics there. :)

So overall I'd say (again, not knowing how your HSC requires answers) it's a pretty good essay. :) Hope this helps!
VCE 20
HHD MM Revs (F/R) Eng T&T
ATAR 85
Uni 21-24: BNursing/BMidwifery @ Deakin
Y1T2:
HNM102
HNN122 (double)
HNN114
I hope I don't fail....
Listens to Amira Willighagen and Alma Deutscher and a little Marjolein Acke
~English - PM for P&P/creatives help~
Creative excerpts
Nur/Mid uni journal

For Narnia and for Aslan!

she/her

Basically inactive now. May change. Have a nice day.

Tierney_P

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: +2
Re: QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2020, 05:02:47 pm »
0
Note I'm a VCE student, so I don't know your stuff/expectations etc., but looking at it from a History: Revolutions perspective (I'm doing Russia, so I know a chunk of the stuff)...

legend! thanks heaps! i felt as though i was a little to narrative-y but i didn't really know what else to put in!
about the historian quotes - do you know which historian it was? if not all good
bring on 2nd november 🤩

rirerire

  • MOTM: OCT 20
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Respect: +13
Re: QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2020, 05:23:17 pm »
+3
legend! thanks heaps! i felt as though i was a little to narrative-y but i didn't really know what else to put in!
about the historian quotes - do you know which historian it was? if not all good
for historian quotes you don't need to know who said it
I skimmed through your essay (sorry don't have time for detailed feedback as english paper 2 tomorrow!!)
but I felt that at times it was quiet narrative. for example "the soviets were furious about..." and "lenin's right hand man"
modern essays are about being as sophisticated as possible so this doesn't seem appropriate.
your thesis is also good! especially since you are clearly showing your judgement without using "to a partial extent"- rephrasing the question wouldn't make you stand out.

btw don't be scared of sending it to your teacher! they're not there to make fun of you but to help you, they want to see you do well!

Tierney_P

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: +2
Re: QUUIIICKK QUESTION - USSR National Study
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2020, 05:41:35 pm »
0
for historian quotes you don't need to know who said it
I skimmed through your essay (sorry don't have time for detailed feedback as english paper 2 tomorrow!!)
but I felt that at times it was quiet narrative. for example "the soviets were furious about..." and "lenin's right hand man"
modern essays are about being as sophisticated as possible so this doesn't seem appropriate.
your thesis is also good! especially since you are clearly showing your judgement without using "to a partial extent"- rephrasing the question wouldn't make you stand out.

btw don't be scared of sending it to your teacher! they're not there to make fun of you but to help you, they want to see you do well!


thank you so much ;D ;D
bring on 2nd november 🤩