Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 24, 2024, 09:45:07 am

Author Topic: 4U Maths Question Thread  (Read 663947 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2160 on: January 23, 2019, 07:46:51 pm »
+3
I briefly discussed it with a friend and we kinda agree that you're supposed to just "see" the ray. But there may be a slight bit of intuition as to why it's at least there.

First, note that \( \arg(z-z_1) - \arg(z-z_2) = \theta\) represents a major arc, when \( 0 < \theta < \frac\pi2\). But as \(\theta \to 0\), the arc keeps expanding and expanding until when \(\theta = 0\), we end up with a pair of diametrically opposed rays.

But a significant thing to note is that we ended up with a pair of rays. Usually the scenario of \( \arg z = \arg w\) results in two separate components. It just so happened that for the specific case of \( \arg (z-z_1) = \arg(z-z_2)\), the two rays were what happened.

Whereas here, more or less that \(z^2\) is why one of them is a circle. But at least now we have some intuition behind why there's two relevant components here.

With that settled, I still think we more or less need to "see" the ray. Our equation was \( \arg (z- 2) = \arg (z^2)\), but there is a particular edge case involved. (This usually happens when we deal with the argument just because it isn't always so nice.)
The idea is that here, the special edge case is when \(z-2\) and \(z^2\) are both strictly positive real numbers. Note that under those conditions, \( \arg (z-2) = 0\) and \(\arg (z^2) = 0\).

So the solutions just considered when \(z^2 > 0\) and \(z-2\) simultaneously hold, having treated \(z\) as a real number. This is, of course, when \( z > 2\).

What's the intuition behind seeing it? I'm actually not too sure how to put it in concrete high school terms at this stage. Can't see anything that would make it super obvious.

Remark: From doing some research I've found that \( \arg z = \arg w \) loci can be handled algebraically. But I won't go into that unless you request it, more or less because I'm trying to keep things reasonably geometric here.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2019, 07:50:25 pm by RuiAce »

terassy

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2161 on: January 27, 2019, 06:19:39 pm »
0
Please help with the second part of this question.

The points P( cp , c/p ) and Q( cq , c/q ), c > 0, lie on different branches of the hyperbola with equation xy = c2. The tangent at Q is parallel to the tangent at P.

(i) Show that the equation of the tangent of P is y = 2c/p - x/p2.                     (2 marks)
(ii) Deduce that q = -p                                             (1 mark)

fun_jirachi

  • MOTM: AUG 18
  • Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1068
  • All doom and Gloom.
  • Respect: +710
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2162 on: January 27, 2019, 07:00:44 pm »
+1
Hey there!

For the first question, you can simply rearrange the equation and differentiate, before subbing in x=cp and then subbing into the point gradient form of a line.



And obviously substituting x=cp gets you the gradient -1/p^2, and you should be able to do the rest to get it to match up to the equation in the question.

For the second question, if the gradients are equal for both P and Q, this means that -1/p^2=-1/q^2. You can rearrange to p^2=q^2. From this, you should be able to see that p is equal to plus or minus q. But since they are on different branches, and thus not the same point, p has to equal -q and thus q=-p.

Hope this helps :)
Spoiler
HSC 2018: Mod Hist [88] | 2U Maths [98]
HSC 2019: Physics [92] | Chemistry [93] | English Adv [87] | 3U Maths [98] | 4U Maths [97]
ATAR: 99.05

UCAT: 3310 - VR [740] | DM [890] | QR [880] | AR [800]
Guide Links:
Subject Acceleration (2018)
UCAT Question Compilation/FAQ (2020)
Asking good questions

terassy

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2163 on: January 27, 2019, 08:09:06 pm »
0
Thank you.

I'm going through a topic test and got this question wrong:

The line PN is the normal to the ellipse x2/25 + y2/9 = 1 at P(x0, y0) and S1 and S2 are the foci of the ellipse. Angle NPS1 = alpha and Angle NPS2 = beta. Show that alpha = beta.



I've been doing this question for so long and can't come up with an answer. My teacher said to use the angle between two lines formula. I found that mPN= 25y0/9xo and mPS1=y0/x0  - 4 and mPS2=y0/x0  + 4. But it doesn't work out.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2019, 08:13:21 pm by terassy »

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2164 on: January 27, 2019, 10:15:00 pm »
+3
Thank you.

I'm going through a topic test and got this question wrong:

The line PN is the normal to the ellipse x2/25 + y2/9 = 1 at P(x0, y0) and S1 and S2 are the foci of the ellipse. Angle NPS1 = alpha and Angle NPS2 = beta. Show that alpha = beta.

(Image removed from quote.)

I've been doing this question for so long and can't come up with an answer. My teacher said to use the angle between two lines formula. I found that mPN= 25y0/9xo and mPS1=y0/x0  - 4 and mPS2=y0/x0  + 4. But it doesn't work out.
In the future, please use brackets to indicate what's going on. When reading your gradients, the gradient of PS1 is interpreted as \( m_{PS_1}= \frac{y_0}{x_0} - 4 \), not the intended \( m_{PS_1} = \frac{y_0}{x_0 - 4}  \)
\[ \text{Note that since }(x_0,y_0)\text{ lies on the ellipse we have}\\ \frac{x_0^2}{25}+ \frac{y_0^2}{9} = 1.\\ \text{Multiplying both sides of the equation by 225 gives}\\ \boxed{9x_0^2 + 25y_0^2 = 225} \]
\[ \text{Now subbing into the angle between two lines formula we have}\\ \begin{align*} \tan \alpha &= \left| \frac{\frac{25y_0}{9x_0} - \frac{y_0}{x_0-4}}{1+ \frac{25y_0}{9x_0}\, \frac{y_0}{x_0-4}} \right| \\ &= \left| \frac{\frac{25y_0(x_0-4) - 9x_0y_0}{9x_0 (x_0-4)}}{\frac{9x_0(x_0-4) + 25y_0^2}{9x_0(x_0-4)}} \right|\tag{combining fractions}\\ &= \left| \frac{25x_0y_0-100y_0-9x_0y_0}{9x_0^2-36x_0+25y_0^2} \right|\\ &= \left|\frac{16x_0y_0-100y_0}{225-36x_0}\right|\tag{using boxed result}\\ &= \left|\frac{4y_0(4x_0-25)}{-9(4x_0-25)} \right|\\ &= \frac49 |y_0|\end{align*} \]
You should now be able to prove that \(\tan \beta\) equals the same expression, so \(\tan \alpha = \tan \beta\). And since \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are both acute angles, this implies that \(\alpha=\beta\).
« Last Edit: January 27, 2019, 10:17:01 pm by RuiAce »

david.wang28

  • MOTM: MAR 19
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
  • Always do everything equanimously
  • Respect: +29
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2165 on: January 30, 2019, 04:58:27 pm »
0
Hello,
I'm having trouble with this question in the ink below. I tried to use an argument approach, but I was stuck midway. Can anyone please help me with this question? Thanks :)
Selection rank: 95.25

2020-2024: Bachelor of engineering and computer science @ UNSW

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2166 on: January 30, 2019, 05:03:43 pm »
+1
Hello,
I'm having trouble with this question in the ink below. I tried to use an argument approach, but I was stuck midway. Can anyone please help me with this question? Thanks :)
This question came from the 2016 HSC. Fairly sure it was Q16. Should be in the compilation

terassy

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2167 on: January 31, 2019, 08:19:43 pm »
0
Hi, could someone help me solve part (iii) of this question:



I know how to show the angle of inclination between the normal and semi-minor axis of the ellipse is equal, through creating an isosceles triangle. But I don't know how to show the tangents to the circle and the ellipse at the point of intersection is equal to the angle of inclination between the normal.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2019, 08:21:48 pm by terassy »

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2168 on: January 31, 2019, 09:00:20 pm »
+2
Hi, could someone help me solve part (iii) of this question:

(Image removed from quote.)

I know how to show the angle of inclination between the normal and semi-minor axis of the ellipse is equal, through creating an isosceles triangle. But I don't know how to show the tangents to the circle and the ellipse at the point of intersection is equal to the angle of inclination between the normal.
Hint: The whole point of the previous part was to show that \(N\) actually lies on the circle. Does this diagram seem to evoke the alternate segment theorem?



Remark: You may need to look more closely to see the triangle.

not a mystery mark

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • “Sugar Peas!”
  • Respect: +1
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2169 on: February 06, 2019, 09:29:09 am »
0
Hey! My teacher and I are completely stuck on this Polynomials question. We can complete part i), but part ii) & iiI) is a mystery.

If w=x+x^(-1)
i)
ii)
iii) Show that the roots of are the four complex roots of and deduce that
Class of 2019: Advanced English [97], Extension 1 English [47], Extension 1 Maths [88], Extension 2 Maths [89], Physics [93], Business Studies [85]
ATAR: 98.55
2020-2025:  B Science (Honours)/B Arts [UNSW], Specialisation Physics/Philosophy

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2170 on: February 06, 2019, 10:15:48 am »
+3
Hey! My teacher and I are completely stuck on this Polynomials question. We can complete part i), but part ii) & iiI) is a mystery.

If w=x+x^(-1)
i)
ii)
iii) Show that the roots of are the four complex roots of and deduce that
\begin{align*} x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1&= x^2(x^2+x+1+x^{-1}+x^{-2})\\ &= x^2 (\omega^2-2 + \omega + 1)\\ &= x^2(\omega^2 + \omega - 1)\end{align*}
\[ \text{The roots of }\omega^2+\omega - 1 = 0\\ \text{are }\omega = \frac{-1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}\text{ by quadratic formula}\\ \text{so we have}\\ \begin{align*} x^2(\omega^2+\omega - 1) &= x^2\left(\omega - \frac{-1-\sqrt{5}}{2} \right)\left( \omega - \frac{-1+\sqrt{5}}{2} \right)\\ &= x^2 \left(x + \frac12 (1+\sqrt5) + x^{-1} \right)\left( x+ \frac12 (1-\sqrt5) + x^{-1}\right)\\ &= \left(x^2+ \frac12 x (1+\sqrt5) + 1 \right) \left(x^2 + \frac12x (1-\sqrt5)+1 \right)\end{align*} \]
__________________________________________

Sketch solution:
\begin{align*} x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1&=0\\ \implies \frac{x^5-1}{x-1}&=0 \tag{geometric series}\\ \implies x^5-1 &= 0\\ \implies x^5 &= 1\end{align*}
Note that \(36^\circ = \frac\pi5\) and \(72^\circ = \frac{2\pi}{5} \).
\[ \text{Using De Moivre's theorem and the usual approach}\\ \text{the roots of }x^5 = 1\text{ are}\\ x = 1, \, x = \operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac{2\pi}{5}\right), \, x = \operatorname{cis} \left( \pm\frac{4\pi}{5} \right) \]
\[ \text{But of course, since }x=1\text{ is not a root of }x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0\\ \text{and we know that the quartic equation has four solutions,}\\ \text{it follows that the remaining four roots, i.e. }\operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac{2\pi}5 \right)\text{ and }\operatorname{cis}\left( \pm \frac{4\pi}{5} \right)\\ \text{are the solutions of }x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1=0.\]
What requires a bit more work now is figuring whether \( \operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac{2\pi}5 \right) \) are the roots of \(x^2 + \frac12 x(1+\sqrt5) +1=0\), or the roots of \(x^2 + \frac12x(1-\sqrt5) - 1 = 0\). Note that because all coefficients are real even in the quadratics, non-real roots come in conjugate pairs.
\[ \text{The quadratic whose roots are }\alpha = \operatorname{cis} \left( -\frac{2\pi}{5} \right) \text{ and }\beta = \operatorname{cis} \left( \frac{2\pi}{5} \right)\\ \text{has the sum of roots }\alpha + \beta = 2\cos \frac{2\pi}{5}.\\ \text{Since }\frac{2\pi}{5}\text{ is a first quadrant angle, }\cos \frac{2\pi}{5} > 0\\ \text{so it follows that }\alpha + \beta > 0. \]
\[ \text{The quadratic }x^2+ \frac12 x(1-\sqrt5) + 1 = 0\\ \text{has sum of roots }\alpha_1+\beta_1 = \frac{\sqrt5 - 1}{2}\\ \text{which is positive}. \]
\[ \text{However the quadratic }x^2+ \frac12 x(1+\sqrt5) + 1 = 0\\ \text{has sum of roots }\alpha_2+\beta_2 = -\frac{\sqrt5 + 1}{2}\\ \text{which is negative.}\]
\[ \text{Hence }x=\operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac{2\pi}{5} \right)\text{ must be the two roots of}\\ x^2 + \frac12 x (1-\sqrt5) + 1 = 0\\ \text{and further by the sum of roots,}\\ 2\cos \frac{2\pi}{5} = \frac{\sqrt5 - 1}{2} \implies \boxed{\cos \frac{2\pi}{5} = \frac{\sqrt5 - 1}{4}}\\ \text{as required.}\]
\[ \text{Similarly }2\cos \frac{4\pi}{5} = -\frac{ \sqrt5 + 1}{2}\\ \text{However since }\cos (\pi - x) = -\cos x\text{, we then have}\\ -2 \cos \frac\pi5 = -\frac{\sqrt5+1}{2} \implies \boxed{\cos \frac\pi5 = \frac{\sqrt5 + 1}{2}}\\ \text{as required.}\]
« Last Edit: February 09, 2019, 07:01:56 pm by RuiAce »

not a mystery mark

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • “Sugar Peas!”
  • Respect: +1
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2171 on: February 06, 2019, 10:47:23 am »
0
\[ \text{Hence }x=\operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac{2\pi}{5} \right)\text{ must be the two roots of}\\ x^2 + \frac12 x (1-\sqrt5) + 1 = 0\\ \text{and further by the sum of roots,}\\ 2\cos \frac{2\pi}{5} = \frac{\sqrt5 - 1}{2} \implies \boxed{\cos \frac{2\pi}{5} = \frac{\sqrt5 - 1}{4}}\\ \text{as required.}\]
\[ \text{Similarly }2\cos \frac{4\pi}{5} = -\frac{ \sqrt5 + 1}{2}\\ \text{However since }\cos (\pi - x) = -\cos x\text{, we then have}\\ -2 \cos \frac\pi5 = \frac{\sqrt5+1}{2} \implies \boxed{\cos \frac\pi5 = \frac{\sqrt5 + 1}{2}}\\ \text{as required.}\]

Oh my - you are an absolute god! Thank you!
Class of 2019: Advanced English [97], Extension 1 English [47], Extension 1 Maths [88], Extension 2 Maths [89], Physics [93], Business Studies [85]
ATAR: 98.55
2020-2025:  B Science (Honours)/B Arts [UNSW], Specialisation Physics/Philosophy

louisaaa01

  • MOTM: NOV 19
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 82
  • Respect: +33
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2172 on: February 06, 2019, 10:17:12 pm »
0
Can someone please help with this question?

On an Argand diagram the points P and Q represent the numbers z1 and z2 respectively. OPQ is an equilateral triangle. Show that z12 + z22 = z1z2

Thank you!
2019 ATAR: 99.95

2020 - 2026

USYD BSci / Doctor of Medicine

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2173 on: February 06, 2019, 10:48:43 pm »
+2
Can someone please help with this question?

On an Argand diagram the points P and Q represent the numbers z1 and z2 respectively. OPQ is an equilateral triangle. Show that z12 + z22 = z1z2

Thank you!
\[ \text{Because of }\triangle OPQ\text{ being isosceles}\\ \text{it follows that }\overrightarrow{OQ}\text{ must be some }\frac\pi3\text{-rotation of }\overrightarrow{OP}. \]
\[ \therefore \boxed{z_2 = z_1 \operatorname{cis} \left(\pm \frac\pi3 \right)} \]
\begin{align*} \therefore z_1^2 + z_2^2 &= z_1^2 \left( 1 + \left[\operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac{\pi}{3} \right)^2\right] \right)\\ &= z_1^2 \left(1+ \operatorname{cis}\left( \pm \frac{2\pi}{3} \right) \right)\\ &= z_1^2 \left(1 + \left(-\frac12 \pm \frac{\sqrt3}{2}i \right) \right)\\ &= z_1^2 \left( \frac12 \pm \frac{\sqrt3}{2}i \right)\\ &= z_1 \left[z_1 \operatorname{cis} \left( \pm \frac\pi3\right) \right]\\ &= z_1z_2 \end{align*}
« Last Edit: February 09, 2019, 07:00:58 pm by RuiAce »

Fatemah.S

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #2174 on: February 13, 2019, 11:21:54 am »
0
Hey!
Needed help with this integration by parts question. I tried letting u equal tan^n-2 x and v' equal tan^2x but I wasn't able to make enough progress. Pic attached :) (Cambridge 5.5 question 15)