Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 19, 2024, 10:13:00 pm

Author Topic: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions  (Read 9445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joseph41

  • Administrator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 10823
  • Respect: +7477
Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« on: October 09, 2018, 03:29:08 pm »
0

This thread is for all exam-related discussion. Was it easy? Was it hard? What did you get for each question? Feel free to post any and all of your thoughts below.

If you don't have an ATAR Notes account yet, no stress - you can register for free here!
« Last Edit: October 23, 2018, 03:06:47 pm by Joseph41 »

Oxford comma, Garamond, Avett Brothers, Orla Gartland enthusiast.

GuZz

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 120
  • Socially and Ethically responsible.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2018, 04:38:04 pm »
0
I'll be honest, I did very limited revision for legal....

In saying that, this exam seemed to be EXTREMELY accessible. There were very few questions that had me blank and I managed to fill the entire paper. The 8 and 10 marker were both quite accessible also.

My guess will be that the state did quite well on this.
“If you define yourself by your power to take life, your desire to dominate, to possess, then you have nothing.” – Obi-Wan Kenobi


VCE
2017: Business Management [39]
2018: Biology [29], English [39], Further Maths [36], Legal Studies [35], Religion & Society [33]
ATAR = 84.10
2019 - UoM Bachelor of Arts

BlameTheKulaks

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Respect: +5
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2018, 04:41:11 pm »
+1
I sorta agree. But, i think some of the questions were too specific and in parts quite terrible.
For instance, the one asking for why statutory interpretation may be needed was silly. Especially considering they had a 'definition' section from the Act.

Also, no s7 and 24 or activism/conservatism was a surprise to be sure (but a welcome one).
2017: Psychology [37]
2018: English [50], Revolutions [48], Legal [44], Philosophy [41], Global Politics [43]
ATAR: 98.95

2019: LLB (Hons) / BA @ Monash
Tutoring French and Russian revs - PM if interested!

GuZz

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 120
  • Socially and Ethically responsible.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2018, 04:57:48 pm »
0
Also, no s7 and 24 or activism/conservatism was a surprise to be sure (but a welcome one).
Prequel memes haha!

I incorporated S7 and S24 in the question about the constitutions ability to balance law making powers, talking about representative government etc.

I was more surprised there was no explicit 'using a recent example/using a case you have studied this year' styled question and nothing on doctrine of precedent.
“If you define yourself by your power to take life, your desire to dominate, to possess, then you have nothing.” – Obi-Wan Kenobi


VCE
2017: Business Management [39]
2018: Biology [29], English [39], Further Maths [36], Legal Studies [35], Religion & Society [33]
ATAR = 84.10
2019 - UoM Bachelor of Arts

hdxx

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • Respect: 0
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2018, 05:04:08 pm »
0
What did everyone say for the 10 mark.... the first bit kind of confused me??
And the reason why tanning units needed to be interpreted?

DoctorTwo

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 127
  • Respect: +8
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2018, 05:06:03 pm »
0
Does anyone remember what question 6 part A was?

Lear

  • MOTM: JUL 18
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
  • Respect: +328
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2018, 05:10:02 pm »
0

And the reason why tanning units needed to be interpreted?

Something something legislate for general community health
2018: ATAR: 99.35
Subjects
English: 44
Methods: 43
Further Maths: 50
Chemistry: 46
Legal: 40
2019: Bachelor of Medical Science and Doctor of Medicine @ Monash

Flossy0706

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2018, 05:30:56 pm »
+1
Was there a question after the 6-marker on the ability of commonwealth parliament to make laws (the one with the 16/17year olds being able to vote)?

DoctorTwo

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 127
  • Respect: +8
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2018, 05:31:37 pm »
+1
Was there a question after the 6-marker on the ability of commonwealth parliament to make laws (the one with the 16/17year olds being able to vote)?
Nope

dcassss

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2018, 06:27:28 pm »
0
what were your answers in relation to the very last question?

DoctorTwo

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 127
  • Respect: +8
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2018, 07:07:17 pm »
0
what were your answers in relation to the very last question?


I spoke about the role of the houses and political pressures but I’m pretty sure you were supposed to relate the numbers that it gave you about the composition of the Senate to the roles of the houses and how it would be difficult for the Greens to pass it. Not sure though it was a little confusing 🤷‍♂️

ajs13

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: +5
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2018, 07:37:36 pm »
0
would we lose marks if we didn't write a conclusion for the 10 marker? I wrote an intro and three bodies but couldn't write the conclusion due to time constraints..
thanks

Lear

  • MOTM: JUL 18
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
  • Respect: +328
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2018, 07:43:28 pm »
+1
would we lose marks if we didn't write a conclusion for the 10 marker? I wrote an intro and three bodies but couldn't write the conclusion due to time constraints..
thanks

Apparently conclusion is literally designated a mark but I am pretty skeptical about that. Examiners mark these questions holistically and if you have absolutely amazing paragraphs I am doubtful they'll be like 'Oh I'd love to give a 10 but no conclusion...9 it is'
2018: ATAR: 99.35
Subjects
English: 44
Methods: 43
Further Maths: 50
Chemistry: 46
Legal: 40
2019: Bachelor of Medical Science and Doctor of Medicine @ Monash

ajs13

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: +5
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2018, 07:47:04 am »
0
Apparently conclusion is literally designated a mark but I am pretty skeptical about that. Examiners mark these questions holistically and if you have absolutely amazing paragraphs I am doubtful they'll be like 'Oh I'd love to give a 10 but no conclusion...9 it is'

I'd be ok with that. Thanks

ajs13

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: +5
Re: Legal Studies: Discussion, Questions & Potential Solutions
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2018, 07:49:41 am »
0
There was a question about the relevancy of section 109 if the commonwealth was to pass legislation that allowed that tanning units. What were you supposed to write for four marks? I defined section 109 and stated that the commonwealth law would prevail over the state law as it was a concurrent power and so it would prevail to the extent of the inconsistency between it and state law. However, that only seems like a 2/4 to me..

Also for the last question, did you need three strengths and three weaknesses essentially, because I only did 2 and 2 and tried to link it back so it looks like a 4/6