Hello elyse! (I hope I can call you that, everyone else seems to and it's a pretty name to type )
I thought so too, mostly because it's a good alternative against those who'll be doing Go Back for as their prescribed text. I reconsidered it, and I do feel the visuals themselves support Mod C, whereas the plot would support Discovery sufficiently enough. And it is a visual text, so I think saving it for Mod C would be more effective in terms of analysis at least. But wow, I wish it had occurred to me earlier that I could use one related for both modules! I do have this one other visual I could analyse for AOS (it's a picture book), but I'm wondering whether an actual film might be a more solidly 'visual' text, considering my prescribed is a novel and my second related is a short story?
Elyse will do just fine
I think that your decision here comes down to what you prefer analysing: stills or motions? I find that it's easier to analyse a still text, because you just look at one frame and pick everything apart. But, I think it's easier to talk about motion visuals like films, because you throw in the sound mode as well which is really important. So, the initial analysis is easier for me with a visual text but I find that my analysis of films is better, because I'll bounce between sonic and visual techniques.
If you can double up and do one related text for both modules, I think you're streamlining your study a fair bit! But that's only if the text naturally applies itself well to both, otherwise you're just making work for yourself by trying to force a text into a module that it doesn't cling to!